There are at least 7 billion different perspectives on morality, but the viewpoint I like best defines sin as the failure to reach your potential.

There are billions of definitions of morality, but a good one defines sin as the failure to reach your potential. Tweet This Quote

By this definition, we have at least 2.6 billion deep sinners—the 37 percent of people who live on less than $2 a day. They are the future Steve Jobs’, Mohandas Gandhis, Madame Curies and Pablo Picassos who will instead eke out a living as drug dealers, child soldiers, prostitutes and slum dwellers.

The $3 trillion dollars or more we have wasted in misguided development aid probably represent an even bigger sin. But, it seems to me that the worst sin of all is our abject failure to achieve scale for the handful of projects that have produced measurable positive impacts on the lives of poor people.

Over $3 trillion dollars has been wasted in misguided development aid. Tweet This Quote

How can we successfully achieve scale? It takes planning and designing from the beginning, and the unleashing of powerful positive market forces at the locations where poor people are buyers and sellers.

The only way to unleash those forces is to demonstrate to global businesses that they can earn attractive profits selling transformative products to poor customers.

Is it immoral to profit by selling to the poor?

This is exactly what I have dedicated the rest of my life to accomplishing. But, I am not an economist. How do some of the world’s leading economists view the prospect of earning sizable profits serving poor customers at scale?

“No!” says Milton Friedman, the celebrated free market economist.

“…there is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game.”

Friedman believes that a marketplace of enterprises earning profit within the rules is the most powerful lever to improve society.

“Yes!” says economist and Nobel Prize winner Muhammad Yunus.

“Poverty should be eradicated, not seen as a money-making opportunity.”

Yunus believes that investors in social businesses should only get their money back. In my view, that adds up to a sizable interest-free subsidy, which is a constraint to scale.

The only way to reach scale is to show businesses they can profit selling transformative products to poor customers. Tweet This Quote

My answer to extreme poverty

The microfinance movement and the work of iDE combined have probably helped about 50 million extremely poor people move out of poverty. Even if we have helped 100 million poor people move out of poverty, this amounts to less than 4 percent of the 2.6 billion people in the world who live on less than $2 a day. This is pitiful!

Even if we helped 100 million people move out of poverty, that’s less than 4 percent of the 2.6 billion people in poverty. Tweet This Quote

I define meaningful scale as any strategy or initiative capable of helping at least 100 million $2-a-day people move out of poverty by at least doubling their income. We desperately need to find ways to bring to scale the few comparatively successful models for development that are available.

What are the common features of initiatives that have truly helped extremely poor people move out of poverty?

  • They begin by thoroughly listening to poor customers and thoroughly understanding the specific context of their lives.
  • They design and implement ruthlessly affordable technologies or business models.
  • Energizing private sector market forces plays a central role in their implementation.
  • Radical decentralization is integrated into economically viable last mile distribution.
  • Design for scale is a central focus of the enterprise from the very beginning.

It is clear that all of these factors are integral components of a business system, but this takes us back to the original question: should it be a business system that enhances the livelihoods of poor people without making a profit for outside investors? Or, should it make a profit for investors as well as the poor people served by it?

Design for scale has to be a central focus of an enterprise from the very beginning. Tweet This Quote

To me, the answer is obvious. The only way for a business to help at least 100 million poor people move out of poverty is to follow the laws of basic economics, which means providing an opportunity for both poor and rich investors to earn what they consider to be an attractive profit from their participation.

I have no doubt there are huge profitable virgin markets all over the world serving $2 a day customers waiting to be tapped. By the laws of economics, creating a new market requires taking a large risk, but the reward should be commensurate to the risk. If the new venture is successful, all the investors—the poor customer who buys the product, the shopkeeper who sells it, the company employee who makes or transports the product or manages the supply chain, and all the financial investors in the company—should make an attractive profit.

Providing all investors an attractive profit

Here is an example. Coal contributes 40 percent of global carbon emissions and releases millions of tons of heavy metals and other pollutants every year, worsening climate change and sickening people around the world. Properly carbonized biomass can be substituted for coal and co-fired alongside it in proportions up to 80 percent.

The only way for a business to help at least 100 million people out of poverty is to follow the laws of basic economics. Tweet This Quote

The world’s farmers produce four billion tons of agricultural waste each year. If 100 million tons of this agricultural waste could be effectively and affordably carbonized in decentralized rural settings, a multinational enterprise finding a cost-effective way to make it happen could reach global sales of $10 billion a year within five to ten years. Such a company would not only provide attractive profits to investors willing to take on the substantial risk involved, but would furthermore double the incomes of at least 100 million $2-a-day enterprise participants in developing countries.

The only way a company like this can reach scale is with the financial backing of for-profit venture investments. The only way to justify those comparatively high-risk, early-stage investments is if the company provides the opportunity to make exceptionally good profits if it succeeds. We have two options:

  1. One is to keep hoping that governments will come through with billions of new aid dollars, keep asking individuals to dig deeper for charity dollars, and hope that the low-or-no-profit venture capital space takes off and becomes a truly global phenomenon. We could plod along full of hope but low on results, celebrating increases in impact of fractions of a percentage point.
  2. The other option is to blend the designer’s sensibility, the artist’s creativity, the ground-level aid worker’s understanding of local context, and the entrepreneurs’ dynamism and drive for success, and create profitable global companies that serve poor customers with products and services that help them rise out of poverty. We could unleash the full power of the greatest force in human history – profit – and start ending poverty by the hundreds of millions.

It would be immoral to do anything else.


Update: Please watch this video to learn my thoughts on designing the future corporation.


This article published in March 2014. It has been reposted to inspire further conversation.

About the author

Paul Polak

Paul Polak

Dr. Polak is Founder and CEO of Windhorse International, a for-profit social venture leading a revolution in how companies design, price, market and distribute products to benefit the 2.6 billion customers who live on less than $2 a day. He is an author of The Business Solution To Poverty and Designing Products and Services for Three Billion New Customers.

  • Ron Garan

    I agree 100% with the notion that successful business practices can lead to substantial poverty reduction worldwide. I also think this has been the missing link and why we still face so many problems after countless years of philanthropy.

    I do need to correct one assertion of the post though.

    I am the scientific and technical advisor to the Social Business movement and a personal friend of its founder Prof. Muhammad Yunus. Prof. Yunus does not condemn profit making businesses. He does not assert that businesses that serves the poor cannot make a profit. The quote from Prof. Yunus in the post is taken out of context. What Prof. Yunus is actually saying (backed up by the same article cited) is that he thinks it’s wrong for businesses to grow rich by preying on and taking advantage of the poor. It is true that Prof. Yunus defines “Social Business” as a business that does not pay dividend or give a return on
    investment and all profits go back into the social or environmental good the
    business was created to achieve. But this type of business is to be seen one
    of the many entrepreneurial solutions available to choose from across the
    entire spectrum of available business options. Prof Yunus is not saying that
    his definition of social business is the only option. The only thing that he
    does condemn is businesses that take advantage of the plight of the poor. Any
    business that serves the poor should have somewhere in their calculation the
    long-term benefit of their impoverished customers – they should not be viewed as a resource to be exploited. This is good business…

  • natebbeard

    Ron, would you say Paul and Yunus take inherently different business approaches to address poverty? If so, do you think the main differentiating factor in their approaches is found in the ROI of a project to the stakeholders directly involved in the business development process? There seems to be a fine line between profit and exploitation that make people wary when businesses get involved in previously classified social problems, but do you think producing some type of dividend or return to investors and leadership would create a stronger demand for talent and creative solutions in this industry?

  • natebbeard

    Wal-Mart is an interesting example and analogy I haven’t really scrutinized from a social initiative. Thanks a bunch!
    I’m not sure we have to steer or regulate capitalism though, and maybe this is purely a futile challenge of word choice because we’re all saying the same thing. I feel like self interest is indulged in by short term returns that ultimately hurt the individual in many cases – directly and/or indirectly. So could you say that instead of regulation, capitalism can be best utilized by a long run understanding and far reaching goals that directly benefit the individual? Maybe humans just have a flawed understanding of what capitalism is at it’s core and have attributed externalities to capitalism because of this lack of systems understanding? (This is mainly from John Sterman’s work at MIT – not my own words exactly 🙂

  • Morgan Dowd

    I think there are many businesses today that are reaping from the poor. However, it is moral to do so only if the benefits outweigh the cost. Taking away money for no reason is one thing. Using money for their behalf AND making a profit is another. I know their are companies that exist today with that idea of providing a product to help individuals reach a goal. Those are the types of companies I can stand behind!

  • katie yanke

    Morgan, I agree with you that companies that use their profits to help the poor is beneficial and something I stand behind too. It was definitely eye opening to learn how many people live on only $2 a day. Thanks for the article Paul!

  • Ron Garan

    Nate speaking for myself, I personally think it is OK to find profitable ways to serve the poor. Not only is OK, it is really the only sustainable path to poverty alleviation. What you do with that profit is a question. I also don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with distributing that profit to investors but I prefer to invest and I prefer to be involved with companies that use that profit to expand their operations (and the good they are providing) and use the profit to create more social and environmental good. There’s also no reason why companies that choose to act in this manner can’t pay competitive wages to their employees in an effort to attract the best talent.

  • Kait Harman

    This could be quite a debatable topic but everyone should be aware of each side of an argument. All though I believe it is pitiful to make only $2 dollars a day I do not believe we should not sell to poor people? A customer is a customer in my eyes. It is sad seeing countries, cities and people live in poverty but our world will never be equal. It never has and it probably will never be.

  • Tyler Steinmetz

    I agree with Mr. Paul Polak completely that we should use business practices that help reduce the poverty level around the world. I really believe that big corporations should not be receiving profits from the poorest people in the world, but in reality, someone must get paid. The investors should make a profit, but I really think that the poor people that are served by the companies should receive some of the profit as well. This is such a touchy subject to me because I really believe that we should not be earning money from people that are making under $2 a day. Sometimes this is the easiest crowd to sell to but I do not think we should take advantage of the worlds most disadvantaged individuals. How long do you think it will take to see companies such as Coca-Cola and Walmart to suffer from the same fate that GM had?

  • nvuong

    Aid, as it were, is not just giving people money to fix their problems. Aid should be teaching that man how to work to bring money home. Teaching marketable skills, and helping to develop serviceable communities. If people make profits while doing this, who cares?

  • Caitlin Donohue

    I agree with this article. I don’t think it’s bad or unethical to sell things to poor customers. They’re going to buy things anyway so why not be the one to sell it to them? One positive thing is making whatever they want/whatever other people have more affordable for them.

  • jack lomax

    it’ll never be equal with an outlook like that! lol
    But in all seriousness you are right. We have the POTENTIAL to be equal, but the level of greed in the world, and the lack of cohesiveness and common goals on a global scale means priorities aren’t “lets end poverty”, its more “lets see who can make the best phone” (when they are all the same anyway!) and “lets see who can make the most money”. It’s disappointing that we have the means and the potential to change the world, but we won’t. And that sucks.

  • Matthew McDonald

    In economics, the market decides. I believe the entrepreneurs who can make a profit should do what they do. However, responsibility needs to be had. I don’t advocate proliferating capitalism just so we can make more money. I believe it should be a responsibility of ours to create value in markets by helping the poor, rather than exploiting them. Then, the markets will grow.

  • WolfgramKA06

    Thank you for this article. It’s great to see that we can make a difference to the less fortunate by helping them live off of their $2/day. It’s difficult to understand how the economy is so misguided at times. My question to you is, how do you think your ideas of helping these “poor customers” over the next few years? Do you see innovations with technology or certain products that can help in a greater way?

  • schrammjm26

    This is a the best article I have seen on here for creating discussion because it is so controversial. If everyone had the mindset to take care of everyone then it would be realistic to eradicate poverty and allow everyone equal opportunity. In my opinion however this is nothing more than a dream. I obviously have a bias opinion because I was brought up with a family that provided me with more than enough in my life, live has also taught me that you cannot make everyone happy. I have learned to focus on helping those who I care about and have personal connections with and I would rather make a life changing impact on one person I care about than a microscopic impact on millions. I realize that this is selfish and maybe my perspective would change if I were in a position to help millions, when it comes down to business though, money will always be the bottom line. I find that there is a strong element of Darwinism in human nature and I believe it will always be there. Some people are gifted with the passion and resources to help millions but the majority of the world will be perfectly content with helping the people that are closest to them. There will always be a cost to any business and more times than not those in less fortunate positions will end up paying the price. This is simply the price that must be paid to evolve as a race. Every other species aside from humans are still in existence because the strong come together through primal instincts to ensure their survival. From a logical and non-emotional standpoint this is what humans should do for the betterment of the human race. From an emotional stand-point this would be morally wrong and irresponsible. There is no clear right or wrong here.

  • jeffrey schilling

    Not only is it imoral, but in gods eye aa true sin against humanity itself, and that is why this world as we know it is headed straight to hell in a handbasket and just as well since nobody seems to want to speend a damned red cent to make it more livable planet!!!!!

  • aulm92

    Matthew, I was trying to put my thoughts into post when i came across your post. I really think you hit the nail on the head, it is our responsibility to create value and help the poor and by doing so the markets will grow and everyone will profit.

  • Max Rude

    This is what I believe also. We can still sell to a poor customer if we can take pride in what we are selling. Why would anyone be morally wrong to sell an item of worth to a customer who needs/will buy it regardless.

  • amykahl8

    I think that if someone was targeting poor people to sell his products to in a dishonest way that would be very immoral. However, since you want to provide them with business opportunities and help them move out of poverty, this is obviously a positive thing. My only question is how exactly can you get them to trust you?

  • Leija2014

    I agree with your comment! We are all consumers, so why not be the one to sell them products. I think the true sin is making money and not giving back. If I made so much discretionary income from the poor, I would donate to their charities.

  • amandatwolf

    I can see how business operations in poor areas are a controversial topic. Ultimately though, I see no reason why it would be inherently immoral to cater to a poor market. Ultimately, it’s the buyers choice if they decide to purchase something and providing a poor target market with a good that could potentially improve their lives seems like a positive thing. Of course, context is important to consider as well. As long as the business isn’t exploiting the people or doing anything to make their living standards any worse, I see no reason why this would be immoral.

  • Caitlin Donohue

    Yes, that’s a good idea to do as well. Possibly even give to a charity that somehow touches the people you are selling too. That could build a great relationship!

  • kalscheuar30

    At first I wasn’t going to read this article because it looked long. However, I really dug the title so I continued. I thought it was awesome how you acknowledged that people in poverty have the potential to be successful but instead living their lives as drug dealers, child soldiers, etc. That’s the reality, from first hand experience I know what it’s like being a dealer, thief, and con due to lack of money and opportunity. Is it immoral to earn attractive profits from the poor? Yes, if you’re some a$$hole only looking to benefit yourself. That my friend is a way you’ll get robbed at gun point, or have your house broken into :). However, your approach is beneficial to everybody and is beyond admirable. Taking the time to listen to poor customers and doing something to help them, that’s anything but immoral. It’s immoral not to help them. How are people going to get out of poverty (legally) with out an opportunity!? My question is did you originally approach this in order to do good AND help the poor? I read your whole article but I’m curious, what was your TRUE originally intention?

  • eeki

    fine but let´s talk about profit sharing. who wins?

  • lex_alwaysMIA

    I agree, what was the true intent of this article? When you read an
    article or hear issues addressed to the poor, there is no positivity
    about it. Poor neighborhoods and communities are blamed for higher
    taxes, property values decreasing, and other discriminative attributes.
    If you put anybody in a situation and it’s based upon survival, you see
    these actions. In the United States, everything revolves around money,
    power, and respect. The rich will continue to gain while the poor is
    penalized for their financial status. Great article, I hope your intent
    was genuine.

  • masterdan55

    Thanks for posting this article! Had some good insights and was brought out some good conversation within my friends. People in poverty need all the help they can get. What is the first step to helping communities in a poverty ridden area?

  • mohammed
  • mohammed

    Do you need a quick long or short term loan with a relatively low interest rate as low as 3%? We offer business loan, personal loan, home loan, auto loan,student loan, debt consolidation loan e.t.c. no matter your credit score. We are guaranteed in giving out financial services to our numerous clients all over world. With our flexible lending packages, loans can be processed and transferred to the borrower within the shortest time possible, contact our specialist for advice and finance planning. If you need a quick loan contact us via Email:[email protected]

  • bernard butty

    We are direct provider for BG/SBLC specifically for lease, at leasing price of (5.0 +2)% of face value, Issuance by HSBC Bank London , Barclays Bank London , Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas, & AAA Rated Banks in Europe, Middle East or USA.

    All relevant business information will be provided upon request.
    If Interested kindly contact me via Email:~
    Mr. Bernard butty
    Email: [email protected]

  • Steven Bichler

    This article made me think in new ways. In one hand it is very businesses right to make money, thats what they are meant to do. However their are certain morals that you just shouldn’t break. I stand on the fence on this issue, all sides have very valid points as to why theirs make sense.

  • goodman

    I’m Marsha Goodman, and I’m a Mortgage Loan Officer committed to
    helping all of my clients fully explore their home loan options and
    feel confident about their choices. In my 35 years of experience
    working with third party affordable housing assistance programs,
    conventional conforming and “jumbo loans”, government loans, home
    equity lines of credit and investment property loans and more, I’ve
    been able to share my knowledge of the mortgage industry and
    especially the Peartrees City market. My website offers resources and
    calculators for your convenience, and I’m available to assist you at
    any point along the way toward meeting your
    home loan goals.Email Us:[email protected]

  • goodman

    Brothers/Sister’s. Are you looking for loan to finance your large or small business,we’ll help you get the large amount of loan you desire for your business,we offer first class business and commercial loan to enable small scale business attain success in obtaining start up or refinance their business Bad credit rating accepted and poor business performance are accepted.apply today via email):[email protected]

  • Mrs Lilient

    Good Day Sir/Madam:

    Do you need an urgent loan to finance your business or in any purpose? we are certified and legitimate and international licensed loan lender We offer loans to Business firms, companies and individuals at an affordable interest rate of 2% , It might be a short or long term loan or even if you have poor credit, We shall process your loan as soon as we receive your application.

    we are an independent financial institution. We have built up an excellent reputation over the years in providing various types of loans to thousands of our customers. We Offer guaranteed loan services of any amount to citizens and non-citizens we offer easy personal loans, commercial/business loan, car loan, leasing/equipment finance, debt consolidation loan, home loan, for all citizens and non-citizens with either a good or bad credit history. If you are interested in our above loan offer you are advice to filling the below information and return to us for more details,You can contact us with this email { [email protected] } We shall respond to you as soon as we receive your loan application details.

    Our aims is to provide the best to our customers and give them a secure service OUR PACKAGES INCLUDE:

    *Home Loan
    *Auto Loan
    *Mortgage Loan
    *Business Loan
    *International Loan
    *Personal Loan *
    * Loan for any kinds

    No social security and no credit check, 100% Guarantee. All you have to do is let us know exactly what you want and we will surely make your dream come true. ( RAMOND SCOTT LOAN FIRM LTD.). says YES when your banks say NO. Lastly, we fund small scale loan firm, intermediaries, small scale financial institutions for we have unlimited capital. For further details to go about procuring a loan contact us, Kindly respond immediately to this email: [email protected]

    Note that loan is given out in 2% interest rate yearly, kindly get back to us now if interested.

    Best Regards.
    Mr Ramond Scott

  • Smater Fater
  • Arvin Baileigh

    We offer fresh cut bank instrument for lease/sale, such as BG, SBLC, MTN, Bank Bonds, Bank Draft, T strips and other. Leased Instruments can be obtained at minimal expense to the borrower compared to other banking options and we also discount/monetize BG’s.

    This offer is open to both individuals and corporate bodies.

    If in need of our services, contact me for detail information.

    Thank you,

    Mr.Arvin Baileigh

    email:[email protected]

  • SkyGroup Finaid

    We offer Business funds and Personal funds to anybody above 18 years with low interest rate If you are financially stressed, You have no more problem again because I will surely solve your financial stress with ease. This funds company can be trusted because of our vast experience over the years, Serious Applicant should contact us through email: [email protected]

  • evillarr6

    I don’t have any moral opposition to earning honest profits from those in poorer areas. No one is forcing people to buy goods/services from these new businesses. Also, creating businesses in poorer areas could increase job opportunities for those struggling.

  • Murugi Kaniaru

    This is an interesting question to consider. I do not believe it is immoral to sell to those in poor communities because the nature of the free market is buying and selling. However, I do believe it is immoral to exploit a community group if one is aware of the financial state of that group.

  • anujaya

    I don’t think there is anything immoral about profiting from a poor group of people as long as you’re doing it honestly. Honestly in the sense, selling products and services at a reasonable cost, treating the customers with respect, and not causing significant turmoil in the communities you operate in. But these are things that a business owner should think about when selling to the top 1% as well. It’s just good business ethics.

    Also, I like the quote, “We should let some people get rich first,” by Deng Xiaoping. The way most countries have developed, the poor get richer and rise to form a middle class as the previous middle class and upper classes move up and get even wealthier. Is it perfect? I don’t think so. But, from everything I’ve seen, that’s how economics and people work.

  • Bangyan Zhang

    With my opinion, I think it is not immoral. However, helping people, improving their life, bringing something really useful for those people. Those are the critical purpose for companies to earn money. Profits is business. But if we can bring happiness to those persons who are poor, it is an amazing business as well. Earning money and bring happiness. It should be business.

  • Paul Townsend

    I agree with the author of this posting. I believe that both the business and the poor are to profit. The poor cannot be helped unless the business is sucessful. If an organization keeps putting out and giving out but nothing is put back into the business like profit, in the long run the business will fail and there will be no more help for the poor.

  • marsha

    Do you need personal loan? Does your firm,company or industry need financial assistance? Do you need finance to start your business? Do you need finance to expand your business? We give out loan to interested inviduals who are seeking loan with good faith. Are you seriously in need of an urgent loan contac us at Email: [email protected]
    APPLICATION DETAILS
    Your Full Details:
    Full Name:
    Loan Amount Need:
    Loan Duration:
    Phone Number:
    Applied before?
    State:
    Monthly Income:
    Country:
    You are to send this to our Company Email Address: [email protected]

  • marsha

    I am a private loan lender which have all take to be a genuine lender i give out the best loan to my client at a very convenient rate.The interest rate of this loan is 3%.i give out loan to public and private individuals.the maximum amount i give out in this loan is $1,000,000.00 USD why the minimum amount i give out is 5000.for more information contact us email [email protected]
    Your Full Details:
    Full Name :………
    Country :………….
    state:………….
    Sex :………….
    Address…………
    Tel :………….
    Occupation :……..
    Amount Required :…………
    Purpose of the Loan :……..
    Loan Duration :…………
    Phone Number :………
    Contact email:[email protected]

  • Malawi Racum

    Greetings to the Public,
    Do you need a private or business loans? at 3% for different purposes If so, contact us now on our email:[email protected] ) type of Our loan services we gives out:
    Personal loan
    Refinance loan
    Investor loan
    Auto Loan
    Debt consolidation
    Business Loan
    Borrowers Application form to be fill and return
    Names of applicants:____________________
    Loan Amount requested:__________________
    Duration of Loan: _________________
    Purpose of loan: _______________________
    Address of applicant: _________________
    Occupation: __________________________
    City: ___________________________
    State: __________________________
    Country: __________________________
    Gender: _____________________
    Age: ________________________
    Telephone Number:___________________________________
    Contact: E-mail:[email protected]

  • cdcraig

    While I don’t necessarily believe it’s immoral to bring in high profits from poor consumers, I do think that it is definitely the opposite of what a business should be doing. As a large business with potential to affect your consumers in either a very good or very bad way, I would only assume, and hope, that they would want to do most anything possible to influence their customers in a very positive way. With this being said, they should either fully educate their customers of what exactly their product is, if it’s not a necessity, as well as only gear their marketing campaigns to those who can afford to buy what ever they want.

  • hirthjp18

    I agree with you Ron. I think its an effective way to actually help the poor. Its been done in the past by mass producing items at a cheaper price so the poor could can afford. Not only did it make money off the poor but it better their way of life.

  • thomas kearney

    I don’t think it is immortal to earn honest points. I think the fact that a lot of people have come to the realization that we won’t ever be able to end poverty completely can make people become discouraged. I do think that there are a lot of people who still want to make a difference and still devotes a lot of effort into trying to lessen the effects of poverty in society. I think the more people that join this effort the less people will starve each and everyday.

  • ReneeBinder

    This article gives me a lot of mixed feelings. I’m not sure how I feel about making a profit at the expense of the poor. I think its great to help the poor out and help them to a better life, but I’m not sure someone should be getting rich doing it. I see Walmart brought up in the comments below. What they do I don’t completely agree with because of how they treat their employees. Many mixed feelings.

  • klain

    I am a private loan lender which have all take to be a genuine lender i give out the best loan to my client at a very convenient rate.The interest rate of this loan is 3%.i give out loan to public and private individuals.the maximum amount i give out in this loan is $1,000,000.00 USD why the minimum amount i give out is 5000.for more information contact us email [email protected]
    Your Full Details:
    Full Name :………
    Country :………….
    state:………….
    Sex :………….
    Address…………
    Tel :………….
    Occupation :……..
    Amount Required :…………
    Purpose of the Loan :……..
    Loan Duration :…………
    Phone Number :………
    Contact email:[email protected]

  • klain

    Do you need personal loan? Does your firm,company or industry need financial assistance? Do you need finance to start your business? Do you need finance to expand your business? We give out loan to interested inviduals who are seeking loan with good faith. Are you seriously in need of an urgent loan contac us at Email: [email protected]
    APPLICATION DETAILS
    Your Full Details:
    Full Name:
    Loan Amount Need:
    Loan Duration:
    Phone Number:
    Applied before?
    State:
    Monthly Income:
    Country:
    You are to send this to our Company Email Address: [email protected]

  • Pingback: nike free mens shoes on sale()

  • I’m not sure exactly why but this web site is loading very slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a problem on my end? I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.
    Nike Free Run 2015 Royale Bleu Blanc Homme En Ligne
    [url=http://www.caylascakesandbakes.com/nike-free-run-2015-royale-bleu-blanc-homme-en-ligne-p-1773.html]Nike Free Run 2015 Royale Bleu Blanc Homme En Ligne[/url]

  • Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and all. However imagine if you added some great photos or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and videos, this blog could undeniably be one of the very best in its field. Excellent blog!
    Chaussures Nike Air Max 90 Homme Blanc Noir Bleu

  • I do love the way you have framed this specific difficulty and it really does supply me personally some fodder for thought. Nonetheless, through what precisely I have personally seen, I basically trust as other responses pack on that folks continue to be on issue and in no way start on a soap box regarding some other news du jour. Yet, thank you for this outstanding piece and whilst I do not really concur with this in totality, I respect the standpoint.
    France Nike Air Max 1 Blanc Rouge – Homme

  • pouls29

    You can’t get something from nothing. Not being able to make a profit in efforts to help the poor seems illogical to me. If I wanted to help eradicate poverty, I would need something to sustain myself, let alone those that depend on me. If I can’t make any money while serving the poor, then I too become poor and dependent, and that helps no one.

  • pouls29

    I can see your point about the expense the company incurs in order to go to market. However, if the employees were treated “better”, would that make Walmart a more palatable company to support? If a company can produce goods/services that the poor can take advantage of, while bringing them out of poverty, and provide a good source of income for the employees, then I have no problem with the company leaders becoming rich.

  • pouls29

    If there is exploitation going on, wouldn’t that mean fraudulent business practices were going on, therefore the company would be penalized or closed? If the product/service being provided truly benefits the customer(the poor), then I see no exploitation going on independent of the financial state of any group.

  • Matt48085

    I personally think there are different situations that require different approaches to businesses and charities. If your sole mission is to feed the homeless, then I don’t think you should be a for profit entity. On the other hand, if you supply a good for the poor and you distribute said good you will need a sales force, logistics, inventory, suppliers etc. and they all have to be paid. Being a for profit company that serves the poor is not by definition a bad thing as long as they are not exploiting the poor for extraordinary profit. If capital is needed to expand the company and provide their product to more households I see nothing wrong with turning a profit to continue growth. My example would be oil companies in the U.S. versus Goodwill, they both service the poor (not just the poor, but as part of their market) but Goodwill uses it’s profits to expand their stores and provide employment for people with troubled pasts and the homeless. The do what they do to help people. Oil companies mean while get huge tax subsidies from the government, and yet were posting billion dollar profits while the economy crashed in 2006-2008 and people were loosing their homes and cars. That to me is wrong.

  • Bryan Parrish

    I was going to use a similar analogy to yours, and I do agree with you on most levels. Big oil is forcing all other competing out of the various markets, or just making it illegal to use (such as hemp) while claiming they provide discounted services for the impoverished areas. Where I differ with you is Goodwill. They are a for-profit organization, and the CEO makes six figures many times over. While they do provide the services you stated, they also exploit the poor and use them as a way to gain donations that are then turned for a profit. It is a great business model though. They get lots of free stuff, so they never have to purchase any inventory, and they sell all they get for pure profit. If you were to look into their tax records, you would see them earning a great deal of money, and only give a very small percentage back to those “poor” communities they claim to service. To me, this is highly immoral, but such is capitalism.

  • danphaw

    The only in which people have demonstrably been lifted out of poverty in this world has been through attracting business investment with the promise of making a profit. The article could have stopped at this statement.

    “To me the answer is obvious. The only way for a business to help at least 100 million poor people move out of poverty is to follow the laws of basic economics, which means providing an opportunity for both poor and rich investors to earn what they consider to be an attractive profit from their participation.”

    African economist Dambisa Moyo wrote a book years ago called Dead Aid that described how aide to Africa has actually increased poverty.

  • joconne4

    In a way, I can see how businesses serving the poor can help. Sure it means them using what little money they have, but if the system is set up right, that can help build them up. If there was a segment of the market devoted to offering a range of products and services at viable prices for those who make very little money, quality of life would increase in general. I would say one of the biggest factors that keeps some people from elevating themselves in life are the needs for basic necessities. If you cannot live a comfortable enough life, how can anyone focus on anything beyond just getting through the day?

  • All of us use ESX5 along with Microsoft windows Safe-keeping Web server ISCSI goals without problems. I reckon that “mileage may possibly vary” can be applied below.
    hermes handbag styles

  • GSonDUBS

    I personally don’t think it will bring as many people as they claim out of poverty, it will help but at the same time, I believe this will create the effect of “Rich get richer, poor get poorer.” In all honesty, I don’t think it hurts to try and I think it’s a reasonable idea/theory.

  • awither1

    I agree with you, to me I feel like the richer will get more rich just as you said and the poor instead of becoming more rich, will become even more poor.

  • conner_faulkner

    I dont believe it is immoral to make a profit. It might be able to create a better infrastructure and take the area out of poverty.

  • Pingback: Is It Immoral To Earn Attractive Profits From Poor Customers? – UNREASONABLE.is |()

  • Shae Moyano

    I agree with Milton Friedman when saying, it is not immoral to earn profits selling to poor customers, because that is the chance some people have to not be poor the themselves. They worked hard to get what they have and what they most likely sell is for the rich people. It is for the people who need help with things. If poor people didn’t have a small business to sell stuff and make money then everyone will be poor. And I also partially agree with Muhammad Yunis. People do need to be educated with poverity but I don’t think it means to not sell to the poor.

  • pouls29

    I would agree with you in hopes that the intentions of businesses beyond making a profit were to benefit mankind. I think therein lies the challenge; to identify those companies masquerading as do-gooders where their products can indirectly affect society negatively. For example, the tobacoo companies. How long were they marketing to the public about their products when they knew the health risks associated with their products.

    But I believe that it’s not the business’s responsibility to determine if the consumer “needs” their product or not. It’s the consumer’s. Part of the business’s strategy should know and understand the market conditions as it relates to their product. If there is a demand, they should provide the product/solution. If not, it wouldn’t be the best decision to push to market.

  • january26throwaway

    Apparently, society in general doesn’t think it odd to produce the majority of products by underpaying poor people. Its hard to say though, since in any capitalist society, profit is essential and one man’s profit is another mans’ loss. The current markets really rigged though. There’s no competition, and it has made us all poor.

  • Bill Alsobrook

    Emotionally I can identify with Yunus, but that is it. When actually operating in reality and logically, Yunus’ ideas, like communism, simply cannot work. Think about this logically for a second, you cannot eliminate poverty in this world…it is an impossibility. Even if EVERYONE in the world were to have a minimum salary of $1,000,000 USD per annum, the poverty level would also jump proportionately, ie now instead of $20,000 a year being the benchmark for poverty the number would increase to 1.5 million. We could all be multi millionaires but this would be an artificial title.

  • Pingback: Google()

  • Jeremy Rhone

    I agree with this. If the product or service benefits the poor, then this benefit can help bring them out of poverty. Polak mentions that the idea should be a step towards doubling the $2/day income. If this can be achieved, then the economy of the entire area can improve. I have no moral dilemma with making a profit if I’m providing a means for such changes. I feel that the difficult part of enacting this would be the distribution system needed to reach the masses, so there’s potential that the payback period could be fairly long.

  • bdelbian

    Ron, you have made some great points. I also agree that it is OK to find profitable ways to serve the poor. There is a saying that goes along that talks about how you cannot help others until you have helped yourself. Despite how much we may wish it was not so, these people that make a profit out of helping the poor, so so because they also need to make money in order to survive. If they are not making a profit, then they will end up living in the same conditions as those that they are trying to help. That would defeat the ultimate purpose of these social entrepreneurs. The point is not that they are making a profit. The point is that they are trying to create something for these people that is more affordable and sustaining than the products that may already exist out there. Yes, it may come with a price, but that is what it takes in order to keep expanding and helping even more people in similar situations.

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair training()

  • ali Alamri

    I’m enjoying reading this article

  • mohanmend

    QUICK LOAN OFFER 2015

    Are you in need of a loan? Do you want to pay off your bills? Do you want to be financially stable? All you have to do is to contact us for more information on how to get started and get the loan you desire. This offer is open to all that will be able to repay back in due time. Note-that repayment time frame is negotiable and at interest rate of 3% just email us. [email protected]:
    LOAN APPLICATION FORM
    1) Full Name:
    2) Gender:
    3) Loan Amount Needed:.
    4) Loan Duration:
    5) Country:
    6) Home Address:
    7) Mobile Number:
    8)Monthly Income:
    9)Occupation:
    )Which did you here about us.

    Best Regards.

  • mohanmend

    URGENT LOAN OFFER 2015

    Do you need an urgent loan we offer worldwide loan to who in need of loan the business opportunity you having being looking for is here again. email us now at: Email [email protected]

    LOAN APPLICATION FORM
    1) Full Name:
    2) Gender:
    3) Loan Amount Needed:.
    4) Loan Duration:
    5) Country:
    6) Home Address:
    7) Mobile Number:
    8)Monthly Income:
    9)Occupation:
    )Which did you here about us.

    Best Regards.

  • Pingback: pay day loan()

  • Alex Marski

    I don’t think it is an immoral thing to do. although I do think it is immoral to take advantage of uneducated poor people and trick them into scenarios where they think they will make money but don’t understand the concept of what is happening. I see this a lot with life insurance agencies going to lower income families and selling them life insurance that they cant afford and taking advantage of their money that should be invested in someplace else.

  • I agree that aid is not the answer as it only treats the symptoms. This is intriguing that Capitalism could concur extreme poverty. Until I just finished reading this article, my thoughts were quite the opposite. I thought that capitalism perpetuated poverty. You mention that hiding in the ranks of extreme poverty may be the next Steve Jobs. That may be the case but what about the rest?

  • Pingback: http://www.menage-poly.com/service-de-menage-residentiel.html()

  • january26throwaway

    Poverty is a billion dollar industry. As far as morality goes, in general, it is wrong to profit off the work of others. If that is not happening, then it is probably not immoral.

  • Pingback: Entrepreneur()

  • Pingback: Best Marketer()

  • Pingback: Campaign Manager()

  • Pingback: test()

  • Pingback: Police Courses()

  • Pingback: microsoft office professional()

  • Pingback: Archicad freelancer()

  • Pingback: backtest trading strategies()

  • Pingback: car finance company()

  • Nlund1

    I agree with Paul. Help everyone in the investment. Why not?

  • Pingback: ebay business for sale()

  • Alex_C_B

    The only way of assuring quality and consistent goods for the poor is to have a business handle it (not a government). Their profits will be a constant incentive that a government program would lack. It’s win-win, except the company is winning more. It’s about the best we can hope for

  • Pingback: paintless dent removal training()

  • Pingback: Adam and Eve Online()

  • Pingback: Black Flag Wing Chun()

  • Pingback: slackline()

  • Pingback: free insurance quotes()

  • Pingback: travel agency los angeles()

  • james franklin scott loan

    Hello Every One,
    I
    am Mrs. Elizabeth Lisa From Ohio USA, I quickly want to use this medium
    to shear the testimony on how God directed me to a Legit and real loan
    lender who has Transformed my life from grass to grace, from being poor
    to the rich woman who can now boast of a healthy and wealthy life without stress or financial Difficulties. After
    so many months of trying to get a loan on the internet and was scammed
    the sum of $ 5.200 i Became so desperate in getting a loan from a legit
    loan lender online who will not add to my pains, Then I Decided to
    contact the friend of mine
    who recently got a loan online, we Discussed about the issue and to our
    Conclusion she Told me about a man called Mr James Franklin Scott who
    is the CEO of James Scott Franklin Loan Company
    ([email protected]) So i applied for a loan
    sum of ($ 320,000.00USD) with low interest rate of 2%, so the loan was
    approved easily without stress and all the preparations where made
    concern- ing the loan transfer and in less than two (2) days the loan
    was deposited into my bank account so
    i want to advice any one in need of a loan to quickly contact him via:
    ([email protected]) he does not know i am doing this pray
    God will bless him que for the good thing he has done in my life. Thank
    God I can smile again I recommend this company to all Those Who Have
    Been misled and Those Who Were fooled, reliable and trustworthy They
    Are. In case you need to know more, email the company on
    ([email protected]) Email Them today and you will be glad
    you did.

    Mrs. Elizabeth Lisa
    God Bless.

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair training()

  • Pingback: adam and eve shop()

  • Pingback: pay day loans()

  • Pingback: http://www.menage-poly.com/nettoyage-menage-montreal.html()

  • Pingback: http://www.menage-poly.com/femme-de-menage.html()

  • Pingback: survival kit()

  • Pingback: http://www.menage-poly.com/service-menager-a-domicile.html()

  • Pingback: Donald Alan Kernan Jr()

  • Pingback: Donald Kernan Jr()

  • Pingback: Donald Kernan Jr()

  • Pingback: http://www.menage-poly.com/service-entretien-menager.html()

  • Pingback: Academy()

  • Pingback: Android Screen Capture()

  • Pingback: Aubusson Rug()

  • Pingback: yummy kiel()

  • rntom

    On the Navajo Reservation, border towns are filled to brim with pay day loan centers and furniture credit stores like Aarons, here’s the problem, unemployment is rampant on the reservation. They prey on the poor to profit. It’s sad to see.

  • Pingback: http://www.menage-poly.com/femme-menage.html()

  • Pingback: buy cd keys()

  • wegener61

    Depending on the product, ethics are very objective. I think it is highly unethical to sell basic necessities at a high cost, while luxury items are for those who can afford them. Of course no person can determine where they are born, and that affects their ability to leave the impoverished area. Marketers need to scrutinize their products and demographics to determine the ethical reasoning for selling items.

  • Radaya123

    There is no harm in making money off of the poor however the crime or “sin” is when that money obtained is does not directly impact the poor people. If you have a company that needs a community to invest in itself to excel in life fine but if you use the poor to make money and give the workers close to nothing then one’s morality is in question for instance sweat shops, specifically Nike.

  • skylar365

    After reading the title of this article I felt conflicted within myself what I believed the answer to question would be. As I began to read I migrated more towards that generating profits in developing countries can assist the struggling 2.6 billion people in poverty. Although I completely disagree with Friedman and his statement “there is one and only one social responsibility of business – use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game.” This statement was completely disheartening to see to someone who believes strongly that businesses must have strong social responsibilities to society, environment, and the world as a whole. This article did convince me that in order to actually do something instead of sit on our butts and wait for a solution to poverty; we need to create products that instantly improve standards of living for these 2.6 billion people. Being a developed country we value profits and generating revenue and if that is what we need to do to make the idea of providing products to developing countries appealing, so be it! It is a win win and I honestly believe it will improve the unfortunate 2.6 billion people, it be be slowly but it will happen.

  • Pingback: We offer the best Appliance Repair Service in Toronto()

  • Pingback: Accessories()

  • Pingback: best muscle supplements()

  • Pingback: good online business ideas()

  • Pingback: entrepreneur network()

  • Pingback: best online businesses()

  • Pingback: network marketing opportunities()

  • Pingback: lead generation techniques()

  • Pingback: build your own business()

  • Pingback: http://www.menage-poly.com()

  • Pingback: network marketing opportunities()

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair training()

  • Pingback: network marketing skills()

  • Pingback: lead generation techniques()

  • Pingback: network marketing opportunities()

  • Pingback: lead generation techniques()

  • Pingback: how to start a online business()

  • Pingback: telescopic mast()

  • Pingback: Face Lift Beauty Instrument()

  • Pingback: internet home business opportunity()

  • Pingback: toko komputer online surabaya()

  • Pingback: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2jisld_integratori-per-capelli-integratori-capelli-caduta-capelli-rimedi-naturali-come-rinforzare-i-capelli_lifestyle()

  • Pingback: na wypadanie wlosów()

  • Pingback: how to get coins in hay day()

  • Pingback: look at here now()

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair training()

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair training()

  • Pingback: arnold schwarzenegger bodybuilding workout()

  • Pingback: travel life hacks()

  • Pingback: Car Shipping Quotes()

  • Pingback: education b.a past papers()

  • Pingback: mobile apps builder()

  • Pingback: home improvement x files()

  • Pingback: 380 Aluminum Parts()

  • Pingback: consider more()

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair training()

  • Pingback: this website()

  • Pingback: حبوب الاجهاض()

  • Pingback: hd wallpapers for android()

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair training by SAI()

  • Pingback: tea detox()

  • I don’t think it would be immoral per say to make a profit off of the poor. If it is a service or item that is needed and priced affordably for a person in their economic situation, I don’t see a problem with it. The problem is much bigger thjut one company it’s, companies and individuals all over the world that hoard profits

  • Pingback: website designers denver()

  • milleram97

    Overall, I think this is a great article without the first paragraph that seems to overly generalize about what people will do with little income. Sure, prostitution happens a lot, but just because you’re poor doesn’t mean that that’s what you’re going to turn to.
    But, that isn’t really the topic at hand, so I digress.

    In regards to the morality of making gains by clients who live off of $2 and below daily, I don’t see it as a major problem-depending what your motive is. If the byproduct of helping other people live healthier lives, be productive, or get out of the cycle of poverty that leads the business to a large profit, then go for it.
    On the other hand, if what a company is doing is the opposite or causing the customers to not have any improvement, than I do not agree that it is the right thing to do.
    Furthermore, I think that it’s important for any company to try to make their customers lives easier in any regard, and that if there is large payback from it, that they should use some of that money to pour back into their people. This may be a stretched wish, but once you reach a certain point in profit, I don’t think the numbers will bring you any more happiness than before.
    Just because you’re good at strategizing and implementing ideas doesn’t mean you should be punished for it, which I think is in the heart of any endeavor.

  • Pingback: hajhullásra()

  • Pingback: legitimate work from home jobs 2015()

  • Pingback: new legal steroids()

  • Pingback: types of coffee()

  • Pingback: Resell Rights()

  • Thomas Miller

    I had mixed feelings about this post as I was reading it. At first I thought it would be immoral to be making money off the poor, but after reading how making profits off of them could possibly benefit them, it started making more moral sense.

  • Thomas Miller

    Makes sense to me

  • Thomas Miller

    I was back and forth with it, but the potential gains seem to be pretty great

  • Pingback: dabs()

  • Elvin Morrison

    Attn: Loan Offer Apply Now

    ******************** ******************

    I am Elvin Morrison, a Private Money Lender do you need a loan to start up business or to pay your bills and a corporate financial for real estate and any kinds of business financing. I also offer Loans to individuals,Firms and corporate bodies at 2% interest rate. I give out loan to serious minded people that are interested of loan if interested contact this email: [email protected]

  • Pingback: özel üniversite()

  • Pingback: tabletki na wypadanie włosów()

  • Jonathan C

    Personally, I find the “moral” element of this article unhelpful. While the definition of morality he uses is nice, ultimately no one is a moral person by that definition. Maybe I’m too much of a pragmatist, but it seems to me that the question should be, “Will earning attractive profits from poor customers be an effective strategy for their upward financial mobility?” (I’m guessing if you’re on this site you’re hoping for at least some positive social impact, rather than the poor just breaking even.) That question is much clearer–If it’s a yes, obviously it’s a good thing to do.

  • Pingback: belfast bus hire()

  • Pingback: auriculoterapia()

  • Pingback: http://www.entretien-menager-genial.ca/femme-de-menage-terrebonne-lachenaie.html()

  • Pingback: htc one m9 Cases()

  • Alex Tomaszewski

    We live in a society where some big businesses earn profit by preying on the weak. A company that establishes a business model with fundamental values that benefits the product or company, shareholders, supply-chain and the impoverished is not an immoral venture to delve in. The statement made at the end of this article “It would be immortal to do anything else” I agree with entirely. I think it’s time for change and that change should begin with the people who we so easily let slip through our fingers in a selfish attempt to better our own best interest, to create power and wealth.

  • Pingback: watches()

  • Pingback: hlektrikoi thermosifwnes()

  • Pingback: medjool dates()

  • epmcinty

    I honestly do not see any immorality or issues stemming form this innovative, economic approach. Statistics estimated that this has brought 100,000,000 people out of poverty. While this may be a small 4% of the average, near 3 billion living in poverty- I do not see any other approaches making such an impact like this. Yes, it is important to be looking for ways to terminate poverty for good like stated by some economists in the article, but there is nothing wrong with making profit and helping business investors, if it is making such a positive impact on the poor as well.

  • kgallaher

    I totally understand your point. It seems we should be much more interested in upward mobility than just breaking even. Really interesting! I think it’s important for entrepreneurs to look out for the poor and find ways to help those in need. If they are only concerned by their own self-interest it will only hurt them in the long run.

  • Pingback: bulk sms service in delhi()

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair()

  • nbaker3

    I have to be careful here as my moral beliefs are based in theology. That said, I think it is obvious to nearly everyone that immorality can be best summed up as “missing the mark”. The trick is that all of us do our best so the issue is not how hard we work. The question is our priorities. Do we prioritize correctly? Do we even know what our priorities are? You have to know your value and what you are passionate about before you can correctly prioritize.
    As for how that concept applies to this article, since immorality is summed up as not prioritizing correctly, we first have to look at what a business should do. Since that is going to be different for every person based on their belief or lack thereof, the solution is not possible in this context. I’ll give an answer from my Christian viewpoint anyways. Businesses have power because they have money/capital/power therefore they are stewards of the earth and are meant to preserve the earth and its inhabitants. Poverty is really an issue of economic disparity. In other words, the rich and powerful keep their money in ivory towers so the poor have no access to it. If a business wants to abide by Christian morals, they would appropriate their money for the development for work opportunities for the poor without micromanaging their lives. Plain and simple: most businesses are immoral because they prioritize gaining wealth over stewardship.

  • Pingback: http://blackjackonline.us.org()

  • Pingback: AR10 kit()

  • shelbysterling

    I agree with what you said about Nike and not compensating the worker fairly. At the same time these workers are choosing to work here, and clearly Nike is proving many jobs; if workers aren’t being treated correctly they always can move jobs. They haven’t, so that must say something about the job availability as well as these workers not caring about their own rights. I agree with the approach in this article, to create companies that help reduce poverty. I just don’t really see how “making money off the poverty struck” makes much sense seeing as people in the United States have free will and aren’t forced to buy any of these products. They are choosing to.

  • Pingback: civil earth works()

  • jfaulkner35

    could not agree more with Milton Freedman. Finally someone who understand that goverment and/or non-profits aren’t the answer to all the worlds problems. Economics has a way of being applied to just bout every situation in life and to solve so many problems which are currently just being solved with band aid like fixes from trillions of government dollars just being wasted because there is no incentive for this money to be put to the best possible use. There are not dozens of investors interested in the outcome of this money. Competition has and always will create better results.

  • Pingback: window cleaners perth()

  • Pingback: after hours locksmith perth()

  • Pingback: photography()

  • Pingback: Z-Wave()

  • conner_faulkner

    The pros outweigh the cons in this instance.

  • Pingback: Blue Coaster33()

  • Pingback: web designing opportunities()

  • l2yza

    I agree with the author, it is not like these people are being forced against their will to work.

  • DavidMizelle1

    Making a profit isn’t immoral. In order to a business to remain active and supply necessary goods a profit must exist. There is a difference between price gouging and earning a profit which can help with expansion and create jobs – a point I think the author does a wonderful job of illustrating,

  • Pingback: hajhullás elleni szerek()

  • Pingback: superior auto institute reviews()

  • Pingback: website()

  • Pingback: guitars()

  • Pingback: friv()

  • Pingback: glass pool fencing prices()

  • Pingback: how to increase leptin()

  • Pingback: mercedes service()

  • Pingback: stream movies()

  • Pingback: beginner guitar lessons online()

  • Pingback: stretching()

  • Pingback: panel and paint perth()

  • Pingback: streaming movies()

  • Pingback: stream movies()

  • Pingback: corporate event photography()

  • Pingback: water ionizers()

  • Radaya123

    We Americans have free will but the sweatshops in which Nike operate from politically, in some instances, economically, or intellectually, do not have free will so they do not have the final say over the jobs they work nor the amount of money paid for the job. It is not just Americans buying the good, a Nike item(s), but the seller, Nike, the makers, sweatshops, transporters etc. The money made in the community is not given back to the community and that is the problem.

  • Pingback: work from home customer service()

  • Pingback: Robert Shumake Cobo event()

  • Pingback: superior auto institute review()

  • Pingback: superior auto institute reviews()

  • Pingback: alkaline water()

  • Pingback: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kQUpnbslok()

  • Pingback: superior auto institute reviews()

  • Pingback: ebay accounts for sale()

  • Pingback: contract hire and leasing()

  • Pingback: minecraft gratuit()

  • Pingback: consider more()

  • Pingback: Legacy Food Storage()

  • Samantha Lavenau

    I completely agree! There is a difference in taking all that they have over investing in something that will help them in the future. Companies should pay their workers what they deserve. I’m sure people knowing that they don’t is hurting their brand and not letting it go to the full potential and that is something that could happen ultimately so you have to be careful.

  • Pingback: Registered Nurse()

  • Ezzato Kareem

    Good Day,

    Who we are:
    We are IFC Investment group United Kingdom. We have tie with top UK banks that champion the opportunity of providing financial services to clients worldwide. For many years, we have built a reputation for expertise, professionalism and results!

    What We Do:
    We offer specialized services to borrowers, students, career explorers, workers, businessmen, bankers,traders,importers and exporters with or without existing capitals.

    Our Consulting Process:
    We provide success-fee based consultations . Clients get advice specific to their situations, as well as connections, information on timelines, costs and chances of success in their financial needs.

    Our Products:
    Global funding against financial instruments like BG,SBLC,MTN,POF,IBOE,CD,buildings,project itself etc
    We also open LC for our clients for their import businesses.
    We issue both lease/sale BG/SBLC through AAA rated banks in the world.
    We also monetize financial instruments.

    Contact us now for more details Mr. Ezzatollah Kianersi
    Email Address: ([email protected])
    skype: bgsblc.kianersi

    Best Regards
    Ezzatollah Kianersi

  • Pingback: testosterone pills()

  • Pingback: auto transport()

  • Pingback: used mobile phones lagos()

  • Pingback: used mobile phones lagos()

  • Pingback: alkaline water()

  • Pingback: kangen()

  • Pingback: Electronics sale()

  • Sara_Kay0316

    Making cheep items in bulk is important because they are more accessible to the poor. It is worse on the environment because of a lot of products are disposable, but there will be a downfall to everything.

  • JefferyDeLaunay

    Well said. It is not immoral if the business is not conducted immorally.

  • maxfunny

    Nike is a great example of this but is there ever a way to end that “sin” or will companies like Nike run wild and still make Hugh profit gains and be loved and endorsed by stars. I feel like Nike, Walmart , and other large out sourcing companies will always be over looked by at least by some.

  • McKennaKJ29

    There is no reason that making money off the poor should be viewed as immoral. As long as it isn’t exploitation, but merely business, then it is fair game. In the free world market that we live in, everyone is a potential consumer. To suggest that it is immoral to sell products targeted to people with low incomes, is ludicrous. Morality is relative and business is business. Consumers make their own choices.

  • Elaminsj25

    I can agree with what you are saying. I just think that there’s nothing wrong with taking advantage of the fact that certain places have a lower standard of living. If Nike is paying workers in a shop $4 a day or so to make a pair of shoes that they will sell for $100 a pair and make huge profits on, it seems unfair or immoral. But if the $4 a day is enough for them to live on and giving them a job versus them having no source of income then I see no problem with it. I don’t know, it’s kind of a touchy subject.

  • Steven Hass

    I feel like this is a case of “the rich get richer” and if you were to just look at it morally, it doesn’t seem right that these companies target the poor. If you look at it from a business stand point and not focus on where the money is coming from directly it make sense.

  • Steven Hass

    I agree because it’s not like they are forcing these poor people to buy the products. They may be targeting them, which is a business strategy, but ultimately it’s the consumer that decides whether to spend their money.

  • McKennaKJ29

    I completely agree. It would be a different story if it were a product that was necessary for survival and the corporation was intentionally keeping prices higher than the true market value.

  • Pingback: click()

  • Ryan Dow

    Overall this is an interesting take on the matter. This is not one sided and provides an all around bases.

  • Pingback: Real Estate Agent()

  • Pingback: buy soundcloud plays()

  • Pingback: Buy cheap facial massager()

  • Pingback: sheds()

  • Pingback: allrecipes()

  • Pingback: unblock viber and skype()

  • Pingback: Vegas Escorts()

  • Pingback: Medical Staffing()

  • Pingback: Producers of Quality reggae()

  • Pingback: pararrayos ionizantes()

  • Pingback: phone system disposal()

  • Pingback: Mobile Chat Rooms without signup and registration()

  • Pingback: online casinos()

  • Pingback: tvpackages.net()

  • Pingback: link()

  • Pingback: Business DIRECTV()

  • Pingback: DIRECTV vs Cable()

  • Pingback: encrypted messenger()

  • Pingback: stop parking()

  • Pingback: fue()

  • Pingback: sms laan nu()

  • Pingback: parking()

  • Pingback: best work at home jobs 2015()

  • Pingback: gurpreet singh malcha marg()

  • Pingback: hurtigt laan penge nu()

  • Pingback: tipps gegen zu schnelles kommen()

  • Pingback: water ionizer()

  • Pingback: water ionizers()

  • Pingback: oakland car shipping()

  • Pingback: paypal loans()

  • Pingback: catering a milano()

  • Pingback: forex robot hf-scalping()

  • Pingback: Power Sellers Center()

  • Pingback: fotografin()

  • Pingback: alkaline water brands()

  • Pingback: joinery()

  • Pingback: small roof repairs()

  • Pingback: sexy girls()

  • Pingback: Screen protection Microsoft Nokia Lumia()

  • pnwlover

    I definitely agree with you. I also thought I knew the answer right away, but after reading this article, I can see why it’s important and it makes sense to create products that help a large part of the world escape poverty. I’m just hoping these companies stick to their mission and they don’t become blinded by the profits. I found Friedman’s statement, “There is one and only one social responsibility of business – use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game.” disappointing because there is so much more to a business than profits. Business is also about sustainability and improving the lives of others.

  • johnsea

    I agree with both economists, but I would like to get a little more specific with my response. All humans have basic needs: food, shelter, clothing, sanitation, education, healthcare. Those who live on less than $2 a day have less access to these basic needs than those with greater income. In my opinion, its immoral to earn a profit from serving these basic needs to the poor. Earning a profit from providing education to the poor should not be allowed. The poor need these things to help them get out of poverty. On the other hand, there are things that are not necessary to human life. I think these items could take as large of a profit as the seller wants, or as large as a free market would allow. I think these items should have such high costs that the poor couldn’t afford them even with savings, so that the poor could focus on the basic needs of human life so that they could break out of poverty.

  • Pingback: learn more here()

  • Pingback: Vital Signs for Medical Assistants Networkable CD-ROM - Delmar Learning free downloads()

  • Pingback: klein electrician tools()

  • Pingback: locksmith anchorage()

  • Pingback: Adult XXX()

  • Pingback: more about the author()

  • Pingback: skuteczne tabletki odchudzajace()

  • Pingback: Passing Clouds()

  • Pingback: legal steroids()

  • Pingback: Fonts free download()

  • Pingback: plumber kansas city()

  • Pingback: Buste di Carta per inviti()

  • Pingback: water ionizer()

  • Pingback: Cheap Nike Shoes wholesale()

  • Pingback: Thai ford focus club()

  • Pingback: cheap calling()

  • Pingback: 3x2 Pop Up Stand()

  • Janice Fisher

    Hello Everybody, i am Janice Fisher by name, an architect. I am out here to commend the effort of Earl Myers,I was in need of an urgent amount of $450,000 and as soon as I got in touch with Myers Universal Corporation (MUC) on Wednesday last week and on Friday last week as well I receive an alert from my bank that the fund was transferred,I want everybody on this site to contact MUC now via email on how to get funding because I got my loan from them and I am very happy, so contact them now through email([email protected])

  • Pingback: Three Link Directory()

  • Pingback: friv()

  • Pingback: Payday loans()

  • Pingback: www.twitter.com/musiccleaners()

  • Pingback: best selling decals()

  • Pingback: Baltimore Car Shipping()

  • Pingback: 411 PAIN()

  • Pingback: RMUTT()

  • Pingback: nasa()

  • Pingback: house blue()

  • Pingback: Buddhistlent()

  • Pingback: clash of clans triche()

  • Pingback: Pirater un Compte Facebook()

  • Pingback: electrician school reno nv()

  • Pingback: hop over to this website()

  • Pingback: Conference Pop Up()

  • Pingback: Comment Obtenir PSN Codes Gratuit,()

  • Pingback: Boxing News at RioterSports()

  • Pingback: mountain spring()

  • Pingback: hog wild()

  • Pingback: vashikaran for love()

  • Pingback: Free Trial Promotional Signups()

  • Pingback: Free Trial promotional gift items()

  • Pingback: pay per day loan plans()

  • Pingback: articles directory()

  • Pingback: internet marketing company()

  • Pingback: internet marketing company()

  • Pingback: Free Trial promotional business products()

  • Pingback: Free Trial Promotional Signups()

  • Pingback: purchase article()

  • Pingback: Free Trial Promotion()

  • Morgan Steev

    HOW I GOT MY LOAN FROM HERMAN CEIN LOAN FINANCE ([email protected])

    Hello everyone, My name is Morgan Steev white, I am from the New Jersey, United State, am here to testify of how i got my loan from Mr Herman Cein { [email protected]} after i applied Two times from various loan lenders who claimed to be lenders right here this forum,i thought their lending where real and i applied but they never gave me loan until a friend of mine introduce me to Mr Herman Cein the C.E.O of Herman Cein Loan Finances who promised to help me with a loan of my desire and he really did as he promised without any form of delay, I never thought there are still reliable loan lenders until i met Mr Herman Cein, who really helped me with my loan and changed my life for the better. I don’t know if you are in need of an urgent loan also, So feel free to contact Mr Herman Cein on his email address: { [email protected]}or call (201) 720-8275 for help.

  • Pingback: you can check here()

  • Pingback: free slots to play for fun()

  • Pingback: grand hotel milano malpensa()

  • Pingback: albergo verona()

  • Pingback: water ionizer()

  • Pingback: hinesville ga()

  • Pingback: porn movies()

  • Pingback: gay porn directory()

  • Pingback: water ionizer loans()

  • Pingback: porn movies directory()

  • Pingback: Healthcare Transparency()

  • Pingback: Rudrama devi full movie online in hd()

  • Pingback: marvin windows()

  • Pingback: visit site()

  • Pingback: navigate here()

  • Pingback: http://www.fws.gov/pacific/script/exit.cfm?link=http://goo.gl/cQU8zw()

  • Pingback: docking station()

  • Pingback: alkaline water()

  • Pingback: other()

  • Pingback: evento fire hotmart 2015()

  • Pingback: pdr training()

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair training()

  • Pingback: debt collection attorney poland()

  • Pingback: Chicago Electricians()

  • Pingback: make a guy fall in love with you over text()

  • Pingback: alkaline water()

  • Morgan Steev

    HOW I GOT MY LOAN FROM HERMAN CEIN LOAN FINANCE ([email protected])

    Hello everyone, My name is Morgan Steev white, I am from the New Jersey, United State, am here to testify of how i got my loan from Mr Herman Cein { [email protected]} after i applied Two times from various loan lenders who claimed to be lenders right here this forum,i thought their lending where real and i applied but they never gave me loan until a friend of mine introduce me to Mr Herman Cein the C.E.O of Herman Cein Loan Finances who promised to help me with a loan of my desire and he really did as he promised without any form of delay, I never thought there are still reliable loan lenders until i met Mr Herman Cein, who really helped me with my loan and changed my life for the better. I don’t know if you are in need of an urgent loan also, So feel free to contact Mr Herman Cein on his email address: { [email protected]}or call (201) 720-8275 for help….

  • Pingback: do you agree()

  • Pingback: PrePaid India Calling Card()

  • Pingback: Seo()

  • To add on to your point, there is also the option for an enterprise to reinvest their profits to support good missions led by specialized organizations.

  • Pingback: Netflix Nederland()

  • Pingback: home roofing()

  • Pingback: Schluesseldienst Frankfurt()

  • Pingback: bluetooth watch android()

  • Pingback: firewood()

  • Pingback: Discounted Wheel Warehouse Reviews()

  • Pingback: make money at home()

  • Pingback: holistic health care()

  • Pingback: implants nogales()

  • Pingback: pile s oriz()

  • Pingback: law of attraction world()

  • Pingback: anzac day tours()

  • Pingback: percentage growth calculator()

  • Pingback: hotel de la ville()

  • Pingback: watch nfl game live()

  • Pingback: low rate call()

  • Pingback: wembley inflatable hire()

  • Pingback: wann kann frau am besten schwanger werden()

  • Pingback: resource()

  • Pingback: globalseoagency()

  • Pingback: biodiesel tubes()

  • Pingback: mongolian hair()

  • Pingback: Ryan photography()

  • Pingback: instantrewardsnetwork()

  • Pingback: Internationals calls()

  • Pingback: visit these guys()

  • Pingback: chiller distributor()

  • Pingback: SEO company in Bristol()

  • Pingback: Yuval()

  • Pingback: Cheap Viagra Online()

  • Pingback: Buy Ray Bans()

  • Pingback: hitachi magic wand vibrator()

  • Pingback: buy backlinks()

  • Pingback: Homepage()

  • Pingback: real estate agents()

  • Pingback: dent repair school()

  • Pingback: paintless dent repair training()

  • Pingback: Jeremy Neo()

  • Pingback: 5 Minute Facial with TimeWise - FREE SHIPPING()

  • Pingback: free to play slots()

  • Pingback: employer background checks()

  • Pingback: 411 PAIN()

  • Pingback: free voip call()

  • Pingback: e seçmen sorgula()

  • Pingback: fuck()

  • Pingback: blue label()

  • Pingback: Six Figures Monthly()

  • Pingback: FZWX007()

  • Pingback: Bristol()

  • Pingback: oz naturals vitamin c serum()

  • Pingback: Diamond Darling()

  • Pingback: you can check here()

  • Pingback: tier2 junk()

  • Pingback: sterowniki drukarki()

  • Pingback: Nouveau Finance()

  • Pingback: Nouveau Finance()

  • Pingback: Nouveau Finance()

  • Pingback: Nouveau Finance()

  • Pingback: What is the Best Vibrator()

  • Pingback: Custom()

  • Pingback: SIGINT()

  • Pingback: hotel furniture manufacturers()

  • Pingback: Ninja()

  • Pingback: Commercial Real Estate in Georgia()

  • Pingback: IT Solutions for Education, Finance, Legal, Healthcare & Hospitality Industry()

  • Pingback: relief from gerd()

  • Pingback: Business cards printing()

  • Pingback: free chat rooms for everyone()

  • Ben Jackson

    Let’s be real for a moment: Who do you ultimately want to
    serve the most: the poor or the Investors? The investors will not be too
    willing to have their investment dollars tied up in a small time business
    venture with very small Return on their investment dollar.

    Think subprime loans of the last two decades: where the
    loans for the poor minority homeowners or the Wall Street types that were
    securitizing the loans?

  • Pingback: xadat()

  • Pingback: Thomas Caufmann()

  • Pingback: techdispensary()

  • Pingback: writing jobs from home()

  • sophia laValley

    It is not immoral to earn a profit off poor customers. It would be immoral to only have products that were accessible to the wealthy leaving the poor out of the market altogether.

  • Pingback: michael kors logo pink iphone 5 cases()

  • Pingback: Australian Shepherd Puppies()

  • Pingback: esikclean()

  • Pingback: vashikaran specialist()

  • Pingback: reiki table()

  • Pingback: آنلاک آیفون()

  • Pingback: check these guys out()

  • Pingback: doubledown free slots()

  • Pingback: check my blog()

  • Pingback: free poker slots()

  • Pingback: play free casino slots()

  • Pingback: browse around this site()

  • Pingback: navigate to this web-site()

  • Pingback: 85043()

  • Pingback: Penis Ring Review()

  • Pingback: macro rock()

  • Pingback: love marriage()

  • Pingback: 85239()

  • Pingback: Banner Stands()

  • Pingback: technology news()

  • Pingback: pet micro chips()

  • Pingback: 86427()

  • Pingback: Android()

  • Pingback: エンビロン()

  • Pingback: 5 Bucks Traffic School Online()

  • Pingback: dental health 1st grade()

  • Pingback: pakistani dramas online urdu 1()

  • Pingback: Bloomington warehouse space news()

  • Pingback: 85076()

  • Pingback: wholesale sext toys china()

  • Pingback: emotional support animal registration()

  • Pingback: how to background check()

  • Pingback: http://www.fetishfad.net/uprofile.php?UID=95581()

  • Talent Davis

    While I don’t see a problem with having a for-profit social venture, I do see a huge moral problem with where the motivation for alleviating poverty lies. Say for example a company stands to make 4 million dollars as opposed to 40 million? To people who have never seen more than $500 dollars in a biweekly check, $4 million should be enough motivation to help, but to a business 4 million may not provide enough incentive to help. Does this mean that the business should turn the other cheek and leave these people destitute? What this reveals is that money, rather than humanity, is at the center of businesses in America. We need to look at what we’ve done to facilitate this mode of thinking that has been inculcated in society by the misguided incubation of the economic system that is capitalism. To truly eradicate poverty, we must extirpate the political and economic institutions that keep capitalism substantively invigorated and engender a new economic system that incentivizes the amelioriation of the quality of life for humanity. With this as the new status quo, the posterity to come will not think it robbery to help the poor but rather a way to improve the well-being of everyone involved in the process.

  • Pingback: fantasy baseball 2015()

  • Pingback: what are annuities()

  • Pingback: حبوب الاجهاض تنزيل()

  • Pingback: Hanjin Account Seattle()

  • Pingback: jamaica phone cards()

  • Pingback: Pressure Washing()

  • Pingback: Realestate agent()

  • Pingback: hotel vicenza()

  • Pingback: ephesus tours()

  • Pingback: Etobicoke air conditioner repair()

  • Pingback: Niagen review()

  • Pingback: click()

  • Pingback: christmas coffee mug()

  • Pingback: crossbow()

  • Pingback: CAD Express Hawaii maui()

  • Pingback: Vinyl Fence Cleaning()

  • Pingback: cheap phone calls to canada()

  • Pingback: Relationship & Fidelity Exams()

  • Pingback: Discounted Wheel Warehouse()

  • Pingback: Discounted Wheel Warehouse()

  • Pingback: Discounted Wheel Warehouse()

  • Pingback: Minneapolis commercial real estate rental()

  • Pingback: kazım sipahi()

  • Pingback: Miniclip()

  • Pingback: Clothing()

  • Pingback: Web wind pro()

  • Pingback: Homepage()

  • Pingback: sled background check()

  • Pingback: satellite tv for pc()

  • Pingback: Must Have Sex Toy()

  • Pingback: Seo_Service()

  • Pingback: Best Seller Dildo()

  • Pingback: Lahmucun()

  • Pingback: curtain singapore()

  • Pingback: New PTC sites()

  • Pingback: games online()

  • Pingback: Bergen Beach()

  • Pingback: Shopping()

  • Pingback: sheepskin rug()

  • Pingback: Guarantee Auto Transport Oakland | Top My Car Blog()

  • Pingback: website here()

  • Pingback: Across Country Auto Transport Anchorage | Daily Checker News()

  • Pingback: Worldwide Vacations()

  • Pingback: Going Here()

  • Pingback: dundas windows and doors()

  • Pingback: Average Auto Transport Reno | Top My Car Blog()

  • Pingback: french doors()

  • Pingback: double hung windows()

  • Pingback: Across Country Auto Transport Reno | Daily Checker News()

  • Pingback: Guarantee Auto Transport Oakland | Americans Auto()

  • Pingback: 7m()

  • Pingback: website marketing()

  • Pingback: Gigs for musicians()

  • Pingback: read the full info here()

  • Pingback: Across Country Auto Transport Minneapolis | Daily Checker News()

  • Pingback: g-spot stimulator()

  • Pingback: free slot play()

  • Pingback: play free slots with bonus games()

  • Pingback: go to my blog()

  • Pingback: free online slot machines()

  • Pingback: additional info()

  • Pingback: online free slot games()

  • Pingback: look at this web-site()

  • Pingback: radio controlled air boats()

  • Patrick

    I think this article touches on an important subject for
    modern businesses and social ventures. Dr. Polak’s point that making profit off
    of people in poverty is not inherently immoral seems quite obvious, especially
    when considering the scale necessary to accomplish any meaningful change in
    these impoverished markets requires capital that can only be attracted by a
    reasonable rate of return. However, I think this strategy lends itself to a possibility
    of a sort of “profit creep.” Any venture that could muster the resources and
    technology to lift at least 100 million $2-a-day people out of poverty by at
    least doubling their income would have to determine what amount of return is
    reasonable to give to their investors. In order to make such a positive impact,
    the venture may be forgoing some significant amount of profit. If primarily
    profit driven entities were investing in this venture, I would expect them to
    push the venture to increase that rate of return, regardless of the impact it
    may have on that impoverished market. To put it more concretely, if the venture
    can easily provide a 10% return, but elects to provide 5% as to lift more out
    of poverty through their business, why would any rational investing entity not
    pressure the venture to provide 10% instead? I would think that the investors’
    leverage would cause the profit margins to steadily tick upwards. I suppose
    this example would only be true of a purely profit driven investor, but with
    such a risky investment, I think the overarching tenet stands regardless. On
    the whole, the idea of for-profit ventures in untapped markets seems to be
    solid. However, I do think that the blending of the primarily social venture
    and the profit-oriented investors may create an incoherent mess that cannot
    effectively mitigate poverty on the scale suggested by Dr. Polak or even on the
    scale that the company originally intended.

  • Pingback: learn Latvian online free()

  • Pingback: Home Facial Treatment Machine()

  • Pingback: learn Italian online free()

  • Pingback: Across Country Auto Transport Minneapolis | Americans Auto()

  • Pingback: coffee shops near()

  • Pingback: flavored coffee allergy()

  • Pingback: MacBook Pro repair in Dubai()

  • Pingback: music lessons los angeles()

  • Vatsa Priths

    This need not be an either / or profit / non profit question. It is instead, a range which traverses many values depending on any unique combination of rates of return on capital invested and the scale of social impact delivered. Nice way to summarize the 5 initiatives that ventures which help the extremely poor share. Also, not exactly sure what an umbrella statement such as interest free subsidy is an impediment to scale. A fortune 10 organization earns treasury determined risk free rate on the cash or cash equivalents on its balance sheet and only a tiny fraction of that interest income ( not even talking about the principal), can instead of compounding for once can be diverted to socially relevant project at a cost-even basis y-after-y. Of course, such a decision on the Fortune 10 company’s part may be for higher social gains and forgoing interest income but it certainly does not impede scale. Mark Zukerberg, spent the last week of October finalizing strategies and overseeing implementation of high speed internet in the remote villages of Himalayan Foothills, at perhaps loss or minimal ( certainly not attractive profits). These remote villages that do not even have landline telephones and the postal mail takes months to reach are going to have internet and all the subsequent good that eventually entails. Further, or attractiveness may not be direct ! .. empowering people at a cost even basis right now may be mean future profits from a healthier and educated section of society that a company never thought were their core users , it can also mean more users of your website ( in todays internet world directly translating into increased valuations). Now regarding your coal example, simplification ignores that the 40% of carbon emissions from burning of coal can be 90% attributed to coal that is burnt in power plants. Can agri-waste effectively substitute that. How complex or easy or for that matter fast or slow is move from coal to renewable energy.
    Point being, the interplay of profits, valuations, wealth, the real meaning of social empowerment, current gains vs deferred gains, a financially sound logic

  • Pingback: top article()

  • Pingback: flavored coffee creamer()

  • Pingback: half price books()

  • Pingback: sandblasting helmet lens()

  • Pingback: have a peek at these guys()

  • Pingback: weblink()

  • Pingback: check over here()

  • Pingback: this contact form()

  • Pingback: check over here()

  • Pingback: andersen windows & doors()

  • Pingback: el cajon best dentist()

  • Pingback: m88()

  • Pingback: dentist near()

  • Pingback: ExtraEnergie()

  • Pingback: commoninsider()

  • Pingback: iphone 6s case()

  • Pingback: Runescape private server()

  • Pingback: no credit check car loans toronto()

  • Pingback: m88()

  • Pingback: musikband hochzeit()

  • Pingback: Erfahrungen mit Berlin()

  • Pingback: przedszkole warszawa()

  • Pingback: hog trapping business()

  • Pingback: growth hacking()

  • Pingback: USA Address()

  • Pingback: end of time signs from revelations()

  • Pingback: deep seating()

  • Pingback: he has a good point()

  • Pingback: أفضل جامعة في الإمارات()

  • Pingback: in Whittier California()

  • Pingback: the secret book()

  • theyoshyg

    To me, the most unreasonable topic I read was questioning whether or not it was moral to earn profit of the poor. It really illustrated the tension between the free market economy that we live in and the morality that we try to uphold as global citizens. I think that it can be hard to maintain a socially conscious message within our economy and this is an example of those two tensions. The option that we’re really left with is laid out within the reading “The other option is to blend the designer’s sensibility, the artist’s creativity, the ground-level aid worker’s understanding of local context, and the entrepreneurs’ dynamism and drive for success, and create profitable global companies that serve poor customers with products and services that help them rise out of poverty. We could unleash the full power of the greatest force in human history – profit – and start ending poverty by the hundreds of millions.”

  • Pingback: real estate courses online()

  • Jasmine Miller

    Microfinance has been the start of an interesting conversation as it relates to the poor. While some will see this as a great way to assist and impact the poor, it can also be viewed as a way to further keep those in poverty in debt. I personally do not feel that microfinace is a “sin”. I feel that the only problem with microfinance would be IF the lending company has terribly high interest rates and/or if their money does not assist those who it was intended to help.

  • Pingback: Refinance With Bad Credit Rating X-files | Bad Credit Refinance()

  • Pingback: work at home jobs()

  • Pingback: Fire Extinguisher certification online()

  • Pingback: official source()

  • Pingback: cheap exterminator()

  • Pingback: http://gulfbar.9pixels.info/how-internet-affiliate-marketing-can-work-for-you4893ngo()

  • Pingback: coffee and tea()

  • Pingback: sick()

  • Rodrigo Bassit

    Incredible article. It truly shed light on the possibilities inherent in allowing for-profit businesses to operate in severely underdeveloped communities. While I have struggled to find where the line between ethical and immoral lies, I resonate with the article as it illustrates the immense power of allowing profit-making ventures to partake in the aforementioned untapped markets, even though ultimate customers are living in dire circumstances. Its hard to imagine a scenario where governments unite to help the needy around the globe in an effective matter. The truth is that the majority of people in this planet are naturally selfish; the majority of people care about themselves and their families, and not much else. They also care deeply about their well-being, especially when it relates to their financial health. To create for-profit ventures that provide essential goods and services to the 2.6 billion people living with under $2 a day would mean that we unite a front of people, investors and corporations powerful enough to make a significant change in a small amount of time. By providing the incentive of “making money”, the number of individuals willing to help (invest) or be a part of the venture (operate it) would be enough to solve many of the world’s most devastating issues. It is sad to realize that there aren’t enough people willing to help, just for the sake of helping; there aren’t enough people willing to give something while expecting nothing in return. But instead of pushing for an agenda that invariably maintains the belief that society can create impactful change without providing a reward to participants, we need to shift that model to one that does provide rewards, but consequently creates mass involvement. Those benefits come at the mercy of people in need, but they also make it so that those same individuals have a better quality of life, simply by creating an environment where more is indirectly given, a greater number of humans is involved, and the impact created is of a much more profound magnitude. Governmental relief can help a handful of times, donations and non-profit organizations can promote momentary change, but the only boat that keeps itself afloat and continues navigating is capitalism, where the selfish desires of the masses fuel inadvertently fuel the development of malnourished economies, while drastically changing the lives of millions in need.

  • Pingback: M88()

  • Pingback: 80w mod cloupor gt()

  • LAURAOM

    It is not a question of milton vs Yunus. The falacy of “microfinance has moved X amount of people out of poverty” is very questionable. You don’t ‘move people out of poverty’ by doubling the 2 dollar a day to 4 dollars a day. The only way to stop being poor is not living slave to the wage and debt systems but rather by building assets. There are 2 ways to enslave a nation, one is by the sword, the other is by debt . Blockchain can achieve more financial inclusion than microfinance.

  • linda

    Good everyone.
    My name Mrs, Renee Phillips, i am from USA CA , i am married, i have been searching for a genuine loan company for the past 2 years and all i got was bunch of scams who made me to trust them and at the end of the day, the took all my money and left me moneyless, all my hope was lost, i got confused and frustrated, i lost my job and find it very difficult to feed my family, i never wanted to do anything will loan companies on net anymore, so went to borrow some money from a friend, i told her all that happened and she said that she can help me, that she knows a loan company that can help me, that she just got a loan from them, he directed me on how to apply for the loan, i did as he told me, i applied, i never believed but i tried and to my surprise i got the loan in 24 hours, i could not believe my eyes, i am happy and rich today and i am thanking God that such loan companies like this still exist upon this fraud stars all over the places, please i advise everyone out there who are in need of loan to go for Mr. Robert .M. Clark Email via ; ( [email protected] ). he did not know am doing this for him,but i just have to do it because a lost of people are out there who are in need for a loan., they will never fails, your life shall change as mine did.

    Thanks and Good Luck.

  • Yaromil Olivares

    This post gave me so much to reflect on. As an activist, entrepreneur, and immigrant who grew up in poverty, I struggle with how to make the greatest impact in my community’s economic development without feeling shame or feeling like I am exploiting needs and pains for my own gain. I don’t see any real answer for that question in this article but I think there could be much more to explore if we engage with “the poor” not just to learn their needs and how we can make a profit but also how we can facilitate their skill-building so they can become business owners and be empowered to end the cycle of poverty for themselves and their communities. I am a strong proponent of the value of collaborative efforts and have seen the poorest of folks earn a living within very limited conditions simply by following an entrepreneur mindset (they may not call it that). I have also seen those same businesses fail because of more-resourced businesses moving in. For example, in the Dominican Republic I have seen a decrease in small food carts owned by “independent” entrepreneurs and an increase in restaurants backed by foreigner dollars. Both are entrepreneurial ventures, offer value and deserve their place but how can we ensure sustainability for all small businesses, especially when other job opportunities are not available due to the country’s economy?

  • Adam Krivisky

    I recently did a profile write up of Paul Polak, and learned
    all about Windhorse International. I truly admired their mission and unique
    take on how to solve the world’s most pressing issue, poverty. The article
    really helped me to gain a true understanding of the philosophy behind Dr.
    Polak’s work. I really enjoyed that he brought up the opinions of two very
    credible sources on the question of morality in profiting off of poor
    customers. Then when the answer is stripped down to its core economic principle
    it becomes quite clear. To service and
    actually aid the problem of poverty, with a multi-billion-person scope, you
    must follow the basic laws of economics. The common features stated in the
    article of helping the extremely poor I found especially interesting. These
    five bullet points could be mirrored in a venture that has no social
    responsibility as well. This aspect was incredible to me, because Polak has
    developed profit-driving elements of his business to help aid countless poor
    people around that globe.

    The next portion of the article that I particularly enjoyed
    was the real-life example given to the reader of an actual market that exists
    where his philosophy could be implemented. If a market is attractive and the
    effort is put forth, everyone all the way up the supply chain will receive
    positive impact. The example given is that of decreasing carbon emissions from
    coal. Like the poverty issue, there is a massive scope with such a problem and
    as a result having the proper financial backing to take it on is the most
    difficult part. I am curious to know how someone would be able to take on this
    issue head on with not only the financial implications but also political
    hurdles that would have to occur to make this a success. There is clearly a
    great deal of risk in a venture like this, especially one that needs so much
    funding from investors before they every turn a profit. I would truly love to
    see someone take on this issue and successfully follow Polak’s philosophy in
    doing so.

  • Sierra Stein

    Very interesting subject to be debating. I think no, it is not immoral to be generating profits off of people living in poverty. Individuals who live in the “slums” on $2 a day can’t afford the majority of products in the market simply because they are too expensive and they don’t have enough money. There is a huge availability in the market to go in and sell older versions of newer products at a significantly lower cost so people in poverty can afford to purchase it. There are hundreds of thousands of humans that live in poverty and they are usually overlooked on the market platform. I think if anything moving into that market space and selling things in poverty stricken areas is ethical from some aspects. It would be eliminating the problem of there being nothing in the market for people suffering from poverty, I would see it as a duty to society. However, although I think “no it’s not immoral,” I do not agree with Friedman when he says “…there is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game.” I would consider that statement to reflect the idea of Self-Interest not Corporate Social Responsibility. To be a company that is operating under the values of CSR that business needs to be going beyond making profit and using their resources efficiently. They need to be doing everything in their power to ensure that their brand is turning a profit while working towards the general betterment of our society. Supporting real causes and addressing problems within their industry and on a grand spectrum the world.

  • Pingback: Payday Loan Etobicoke | paydayloansboy.com()

  • Pingback: [Opinion] The Promise of the Computer Leaves Some People Behind | Human Services Consulting and Training (HSCT)()

  • Pingback: [Opinion] The Promise of the Computer Leaves Some People Behind - HSCT()

  • This is not one sided and provides an all around bases. Overall this is an interesting take on the matter.
    http://www.autoankauf-zurich.ch/

  • Mitchell Kaye

    I feel like there is a fundamental difference that wasn’t ever really discussed. You can make money by providing a service or product that impoverished people will buy. This product could solve a problem that makes it valuable and provides the poor person with a smart reason to buy it. This helps both parties. Selling something like a generator or new way to harvest crops to a poor person provides value to them that makes that spent money worth it to them. However if you’re making money off of the exploitation of poor people, and it does not benefit them, then you are committing the sin. When companies monopolize the water supply and then increase the price on it and use that to essentially punish poor people, they are not displaying positive business practices. However, inclusive business practices where both parties leave the transaction better off can most certainly be profitable. Things like giving micro-loans to impoverished people can grant them enormous flexibility that they didn’t have before. Without the financial incentive of profit though, these micro-loans would rarely occur, as people need to see value when they put their money in a risky situation.
    In general, I just think the important distinction needs to be made between predatorily profiting off the backs of the poor, and giving them a valuable product or service that they feel is worth the money you charge.
    Another example of good business practices that enrich the lives of both parties, but still turn a profit, would be something like TOMS. TOMS was still profitable, but also provided a much needed product.
    So long as the business does its best to help enrich the life of the poor people I feel like it is acceptable for them to make a profit from their poor consumers.

  • Rahul

    This is an extremely interesting topic and one that I am sure many millennials have thought of. I myself don’t think it’s immoral to profit from poor customers, but it is immoral to take advantage of them. This article hits the main issues on the head though. To truly help the 2.6 billion people around the world who are living on less than $2 a day we need to come together as a society rather than relying on the public and private sectors to continue to poor aid into foundations and ventures that try to solve these issues. While I agree that all investors should profit from such a venture, I still think the ultimate issue of poverty must be tackled from before it starts and that comes with education. Oftentimes people are stuck in poverty because they did not have access or the means to afford an education. If we as a society can provide access to an affordable education for all people around the world, then I believe that we would see this figure of 2.6 billion people drop dramatically. However, the main points of the article deal more in line with profits from the poor. With that being said, I think people will struggle to convince companies that a substantial profit will be made off poor customers. And if the private sector is not convinced then they won’t do anything to really address the problem. I think micro finance institutions are probably the best way to tackle poverty through the private sector, but of course it is good to see a variety of ventures aimed at addressing poverty. Overall, I enjoyed the article and believe that the idea is correct, but the execution, risk, and convincing needed to make this work is extremely difficult to put into practice.

  • Gabriel A

    I agree that creating an incentive-based system is key to create a responsible business and private sector that helps people overcome poverty, but we lack the legal framework and structure to accomplish such objective. However, I believe that the current legal structure does not provide businesses with the incentive to do so. As a matter of fact, I believe that the current approach rewards the unethical and unsustainable behavior of investors, businesses and banks, difficulting the implementation of models like the one Polak proposes. The root-cause of the financial crisis of 2008 and the exploitation of workers abroad is a clear example of what I am stating. I think the balance of what Polak proposes is completely attainable given that we have the adequate legal framework legally and internationally that incentivize businesses to behave ethically when it comes to exploit workers and resources to produce products that generate profit. Having a legal and structural framework in place that limits the ability of business to adopt unsustainable practices will provide the path for the creation of responsible businesses that make profit while generating social change in the process. The emerging global companies will have to take a huge risk when it comes to profit to adapt to this transition. At this stage, we will have to start thinking about incentives that are not only economic, but also social.

  • Jared Zachary Rosenberg

    I believe that your approach to improving markets in such rural and poverty stricken areas “kills two birds with one stone.” The concept is ingenious, instead of trying to solve an issue, global poverty, by giving money to organizations which utilize billions of dollars incorrectly. Large corporations should change there entire marketing strategy. Perhaps the malnourished child in souther Uganda does not need a soda beverage for 25 cents, but instead a nutritional “meal in a bottle” for the same cost. This would not only provide the child with a drink they are longing for but also a meal substitute. That 25 cents now goes a lot further for that family. That is where profitability and innovation come into play. If large corporations took their concepts and changed them so as to help these rural communities at an affordable price while also making a profit the world would change drastically. Using my previous example instead of receiving an non-nutritious soda they would be receiving a nourishing meal. Which would allow them to either focus more on their education or work more productively. Either way that individual is benefiting and will either further their education to receive a higher paying job, or make more money in their current occupation. They can then use this money to purchase these drinks and remain productive. Creating enourmous demand even at relatively small margins over a sustained period of time equals profits. Which drive the economy helping everyone in this situation. Having large corporations gear towards these developing countries would have another impact as well. In the long term as these countries develop and the new generation grows they will be loyal to the brands that they trust. If a company, Nestle for example, creates a delicious cereal bar that keeps them nourished and healthy in their childhood. As they grow they will always associate Nestle with this positive attribute and will remain loyal customers resulting in sustained profits.

  • Henry Newman

    I think it is not immoral to earn profits from poor customers. Of course, I think it would be better if we could help the poor get out of poverty without the poor spending any money because that would help them out more, but I see this as impossible to be achieved. As giving aid to help the poor helps it is not enough. A business, or multiple businesses have to gain a profit no matter who the consumers are. This provides them an incentive to stay in business. And without the incentive of gaining more money, even if the business is helping the poor, the business will definitely not continue even though the cause is good. It’s purely economics, as the article states, that will relieve people in poverty. The best way I see it is a global business starts, in which they offer a range of products and services. These products and services would be for all people, not matter their income. But for people in poverty, they can be heavily discounted. This is what I think is best for getting people out of poverty, and how it would not be immoral.

  • Mohan Mahindra Loans

    Contact us for some genuine and certified financial services to set yourself up with a new business or if you wish to enlarge your business in this new year. Our financial services ranges frompersonal/individual to organisational and we deliver as fast as possible within 24 hours of application with no demands except security provision. We are here to serve you in this new year and help you grow your business and expand your financial status. Kindly contact us via [email protected]

  • Pingback: Is it immoral to earn profits from poor customers? An African perspective – Tinashe Kapuya()