Radical affordability has always been a critical component of the “design for the other 90 percent” movement. But does affordability always come at the expense of efficiency?

The most direct path to radical affordability is improved efficiency. Tweet This Quote

Over many years, I’ve learned repeatedly that just the opposite is true—the most direct path to radical affordability is improved efficiency. We have been able to prove that in most cases, the assumption that affordability and efficiency are contradictory is wrong. In fact, efficiency dramatically improves affordability. After developing low-cost treadle pumps and solar irrigation systems for small farms with this mindset, lately we’ve been focusing on producing a competitor to coal—from biomass.

Paul on a treadle pump

Paul Polak on a treadle pump.

The world consumes 6 billion tons of coal each year, accounting for 40% of global carbon emissions. At the same time, 4 billion tons of agricultural waste are produced annually, of which approximately 1 billion tons are likely available for conversion to a green biofuel substitute. With world energy consumption projected to increase by 56% over the next 30 years, a wide variety of utilities and thermal plants around the world have faced mounting pressure to cut carbon emissions or find coal substitutes.

However, even though we understand the problems associated with global carbon emissions, it’s not that easy to just say coal is bad and let’s replace it. For decades, coal has been a cheap and highly cost effective source of energy, especially for people running big utility plants. Thus, we have to find a replacement to coal that’s just as cost effective without the negative effects.

World energy consumption is projected to increase by 56% over the next 30 years. Tweet This Quote

To tackle this design challenge, we asked this question: if so much agricultural waste is produced every year, then how do you get this waste biomass and convert it to a blackened product with thermal density competitive with coal, but without the carbon emissions?

To start, we chased a bunch of sources of biomass, from water hyacinth to rice straw to cotton stalks. Water hyacinth was readily available, but its 95% water content meant it cost too much to dry it to 10% moisture content. World agriculture produces 800 million tons of agricultural waste per year, making it one of the largest sources of waste biomass, but farmers put a high price on it because it has competing uses (as animal feed such as bedding for animals and thatch for roofs). Cotton stalks were also readily available because farmers needed to get rid of them quickly to make room for their next planting cycle. But, they weren’t as thermally dense as we needed them to be, either.

We have to find a replacement to coal that’s just as cost effective without the negative effects. Tweet This Quote

By examining cotton stalks, though, we discovered a key expense we didn’t expect at all—the collection cost of the biomass. When biomass is in its bulkiest form, it’s often hauled from 200 kilometers (124 miles) to a centralized plant, contributing 40% to the cost of the plant. So, to make biomass more affordable, our design strategy was to shorten the collection radius—no more than 4 kilometers (2.5 miles).

So, not only did we have to find thermally dense biomass that would be an attractive substitute for coal, but we also had to start looking for plants you could harvest a hell of a lot of in a small space. Long story short, there are only a few agricultural waste materials that fit these critical density characteristics.

mesquite

Prosopis juliflora, a species of mesquite, used for torrefaction (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)

After this realization, we asked, what is nature’s most efficient biomass production system? The answer: invasive species.

When you look up the definition of “invasive species,” it often refers to the way they disrupt or damage the environment in an unwelcome way. However, these are welcome labels for a creative entrepreneur. Invasive species of plants succeed because they outcompete other plants in the same environmental context, often growing rapidly. Natural selection has helped these plants evolve to survive in extreme conditions.

Torrefaction turns what used to be a 300 million year process into 3 hours. Tweet This Quote

One thermally dense invasive species we found, mesquite, grows abundantly across dry areas of Texas. The root of a mesquite plant can grow to 165 feet long, reaching water sources much deeper than the average plant. It’s a nitrogen fixing plant, meaning it converts nitrogen from the air into ammonia, which helps fertilize otherwise poor soil. When it’s mature, it can produce 80 tons per hectare—much more than most other plants we have examined so far, making for a small collection radius and lower costs.

torrefaction kiln

Gases flaring off from a prototype of the torrefaction kiln.

Now, with the right invasive species biomass, we can turn it into a thermally dense green energy through the process of torrefaction—a thermochemical treatment that heats biomass between 200 and 320 degrees C for three hours in an oxygen-free environment. It’s essentially the same process that roasts our coffee beans. Through torrefaction, the mesquite turns into a blackened material and loses 30% of its weight, but only 10% of its energy, increasing its energy density and making it easier to compress into briquettes. My team and I have been able to use torrefaction to transform this invasive species into a product competitive in energy to the coal widely used in India today.

We have to mimic Mother Nature and select the most efficient growing systems she produces. Tweet This Quote

As we continue to work on this technology, these briquettes will be able to burn just as much energy as coal. We could even mix them with coal at a utility plant, replacing up to 80% of its coal with a clean, competitive low-carbon emission substitute. Torrefaction turns what used to be a 300 million year process into 3 hours, and we keep more of the carbon from oil, coal and natural gas sequestered underground. The potential to replace coal is unlimited, and if we’re able to continue this process successfully, we can lower global carbon emissions by 20%.

The product from the torrefaction process.

The product from the torrefaction process.

What’s particularly promising about this process, though, is how it could affect $2-a-day customers. If we can establish torrefaction plants in villages in India, in rural areas where mesquite already grows in abundance or where it could be easily introduced, each plant could create four jobs and produce 7 tons/day of briquettes from a 4-5 km radius. With prices competitive to coal, each village could bring in approximately 1,000 USD per day by selling these briquettes to local industries or households that currently use coal or wood for heating.

Multiply that by 365-days/year across 10,000 villages, and that’s a substantial addition to gross annual income in areas of the country that need it most. From a systems point of view, most of that money would recirculate locally, potentially transforming their economies.

Invasive species are the equivalent of radically affordable technologies. Tweet This Quote

Invasive species are the equivalent of radically affordable technologies. We have to mimic Mother Nature and select the most efficient growing systems she produces—it’s essential to the design process. If we can help people get over the natural reluctance to plant invasive species, they can inspire the next generation of frontier multinational companies, truly disrupting the way the world does business—in a welcome way.

About the author

Paul Polak

Paul Polak

Dr. Polak is Founder and CEO of Windhorse International, a for-profit social venture leading a revolution in how companies design, price, market and distribute products to benefit the 2.6 billion customers who live on less than $2 a day. He is an author of The Business Solution To Poverty and Designing Products and Services for Three Billion New Customers.

  • danlorusso

    I enjoyed reading this post because it gives hope that we can eliminate the amount of coal we use annually. Another important part of this article is how we can use an invasive species to our advantage. One of these advantages is by establishing torrefaction plants in villages in India we can reduce poverty by bringing a new industry to places that can really benefit from it.

  • Michael Kaelin

    I am currently taking an Ecotheology class at my university and we have talked about carbon emissions as well as the amount of waste that we create. I enjoyed reading about alternatives as well as ways to decrease the waste we create. I was aware of the amount of textile waste is created each year, but I was not aware of the amount of agricultural waste that we could possibly use as a healthier energy source. Thank you for the write Paul.

  • Charlee Riggio

    This is is so cool! There are so many positive things coming from your research. Environmental positivity, economic positivity etc. It is scary how damage we are doing. This is an excellent solution that leaves very little room for argument. How do we get everyone on board?

  • Ann Matthews

    I think this is a really awesome initiative! I think the idea that we have to mimic Mother Nature and select the most efficient growing systems she produces is a really interesting way to think about sustainability and environmentalism.

  • Kade Hanson

    Talking about climate change in capstone class with you i agree with this comment. The amount of waste that could be turned to fuel is amazing and needs to be utilized. As we learn in our marketing class its about awareness and knowledge and this article is the start of the awareness.

  • Alessandra Orlandini

    Very interesting post, because in my mind when I hear the word invasive I automatically think of something negative but after reading this post its actually very intriguing to hear about how we can find alternatives to help us become more efficient and sustainable.

  • Kevin Marshall

    I agree Alessandra, when we hear the word invasive we instantly think that this is a bad thing and that we need to find ways to get rid of it. With that being said it was very interesting to find alternatives to us to become more efficient and sustainable. As this will help in the long run.

  • Michael Potter

    I agree! Very interesting to read about. I took a poverty and environmental impact course this semester and this touches on a lot of things I have learned about. There is an unreal amount of damage being done but the good news is that the same easy way that it has started, it can be stopped as well! I have the same question as you Charlee, but I think the first step starts with us and articles like these. One by one it is something we can do together. Awesome read.