Why Give a Damn:

Tired of spending trillions of dollars on poverty and getting nowhere? Here’s a chance to learn from one of the most resourceful business men around, who happens to be solving poverty along his way.

The author of this post, Cheryl Heller, designs change and growth for business leaders and social entrepreneurs. She is Founding Chair of MFA Design for Social Innovation at SVA.

Forget poverty. Let’s talk about business.

In an article I just finished for How Magazine on the future of design, I used Paul Polak as a case for why generalists are so important to the world right now. I said, “For example, it would be easy to think of global development pioneer Paul Polak as an expert in alleviating poverty, but he has been successful at that because he’s also a shrink, an inventor, an entrepreneur, a writer, a researcher and a self-made engineer. Polak is a generalist of the highest order.”

For anyone in our world of social innovation who doesn’t know about Paul (which is acceptable only if you recently landed from Pluto), he is the founder of IDE, author of Out of Poverty, creator of “Design for the other 90%”, content provider to the course at Stanford on “Ruthless Affordability”, inspiration to social entrepreneurs and development people everywhere, hero to the over 3,000 poor people he has met and spent time with, and the root cause of 20 million people’s transition from poverty to the middle class.

I have known Paul for years, through the evolution of many of the above accomplishments. Which is why it surprised me to realize when we spent a few days together at the Unreasonable Institute recently that Paul has not been working on poverty for all these years at all. He’s just a business junkie who saw a big marketing opportunity where nobody else recognized it. He has a good businessman’s resourcefulness and relentless drive to make things profitable for everyone. And moreover, he just may be the world’s most practical man.

Lots of people come up with theories, write papers and books about them, build arguments in their defense to better attack other theories, and sometimes get celebrities to give their frameworks a lot of glitz, if not gravitas.

Others, like Paul, first act where they see a need, and make decisions based on what makes sense to them. Oftentimes, they are so busy acting that they don’t take the time to stop and figure out what new theory they have been acting out. Sometimes, they have to look back at where they’ve been to figure out where they’re going. This is to say that what’s now becoming clear to Paul, at the youthful age of 78, is what he’s been doing all along.

When you talk to Paul it takes about 15 seconds for him to dive into the pragmatic details of his six or so latest business ventures. It’s easy at first to be overwhelmed with detail, but if you stay with it, you realize that he has taken practicality and common sense to a blazing edge. In a very different context, it’s what I imagine it must have been like to talk to Sam Walton in the early days of Wal-Mart – someone for whom sweating the details and making every little thing work was the enormity of the idea. When Paul talks about poor people, he can floor you with self-evident truths so practical, and from a point of view so knowing, experienced and clear-eyed that it becomes a wholly new way of seeing. This is important because when your target audience is every one of the 2.6 billion people in the world who live on $2 a day, you have to keep your eyes open, and work, as they say in business, with very tight margins.

To recast Paul’s approach to ending poverty through the new lens of “Paul’s just a damn good businessman and here’s how he’s done business in places where there was none”, these are Paul’s theories, proven by a lifetime of action and results:

1. Marketing, 2.00.

Typically, businesses don’t like poverty, they see nothing in it for them, and they’ve been right. From a business standpoint, poverty has been a lousy investment: trillions of dollars spent, a temporary dent made. Most of what has been tried hasn’t worked.

There is no question that selling products to people who make $2 a day is a hard way to make a buck. But Paul is setting out to prove that when you know what you’re doing, there’s a multi-trillion dollar marketplace 1 waiting to be had – you just have to turn marketing on its head to see it.

Paul is a marketer of the most creative kind, commissioning Bollywood films to screen on the sides of trucks, going door-to-door with demos showing people the bacteria in their own drinking water – scaring them into buying pure water. And not least, understanding that an aspirational brand – part of every one of his businesses – plays the same role with poor people that it does with the fashionistas of the world.

2. Go for the market disruptors – in poverty as in business.

When looking to create systemic transformation, identify the keystone, transformational products or services. They have a cascading effect, creating ripples of change and growth in other areas. For example, the chain reaction of Paul’s torrefaction business: Raise $10k to put up a torrefaction plant in a village, which creates products worth $600 a day, $180k a year. The plant represents jobs for four people, small-acre farmers who have money where there was none before. There are jobs as well for the people who pull, chop and pile the mesquite that’s burned, dry and deliver it to the plant – 7 jobs for every village. This creates a wealthy enterprise, and prestige for the town, which attracts more business. The torrefaction plant makes energy cheaper, helps all the businesses that use it to reduce costs, raise profits and positively impacts climate change. All that transformation for a $10k investment.

3. Even when you’re off the map, it’s location location location.

Everyone who sells anything knows that you need to put yourself where your customers are. Sometimes that’s on a high-traffic street or mall, sometimes it’s a place that’s easy to find on the internet.

To do business where Paul is doing it, the principle is equally inviolate, but the locations are wild. For example, for SpringHealth, the water purification business now rolling out in India, kirana shops double as purification centers, adding clean water to the toothpaste, biscuits and candy they typically sell. These humble kiosks in rural villages don’t look like prime real estate for a big new product launch, but they are centrally located, and they add up; there are anywhere from 6 to 9 million of them.

And it goes further, not just to the last mile, but the last 500 feet. Deliverymen go door to door with water on the back of motorcycles, and additional products are being developed to take advantage of that prime location on the back of the bike.

4. Never take your eye off the bottom line.

Whether you’re dealing with millions or pennies, the discipline is the same, the numbers have to add up, the model has to make sense. There are no exceptions. Even though the numbers are small, it doesn’t mean there aren’t places to find inefficiencies and make a profit.

Again in the torrefaction business, by shortening the collection radius of biomass from 50 kilometers to 4 kilometers and switching from big machines to carts or tractors, a 40% reduction in cost is the basis of what can become a huge business.

It scales well beyond the village. When people move from $2 a day to $3 or 4, they become consumers; that makes a huge impact on the global economy.
They start to pay taxes, they have smaller families. Raising the income level of farmers has been proven to raise the economies of entire countries, like China, South Korea and Taiwan.

5. Think huge, and don’t be a victim of your emotions.

Paul’s rule is that a business has to have the potential to reach 100 million people and generate at least $10 billion in sales in order to be worthwhile. Seeing that potential will make it real.

While passion and empathy draw people to help others they are anything but the secret to success. Hard-headed business strategy will go much further to change lives. Caring deeply about helping people should spur pragmatism, not romanticism.

There are practical lessons here for all involved: Don’t fall in love with your altruism when you don’t have a sustainable solution to poverty, and don’t fall in love with your new business idea unless it can really impact the world.

1 From Paul’s upcoming book: “the poor countries that comprise the Global South generate $12 trillion, or nearly one-fifth (18 percent) of the world’s total economic output. And every year, according to the Financial Times, approximately $1 trillion more is invested in emerging economies (including the four biggest ones).”

An Unreasonable Challenge:

Put your idea to Paul’s test. How many people can it potentially impact? Is it a good business idea that can be sustained? Do you have a transformational product or service that will start a chain reaction to affect the world? No you say? Then toss it and start over.

Update: We want to begin an initiative to codify Paul Polak’s work so that it can be adapted to other places and innovators. If I knew how much time it would take to find funding, I would have asked our Unreasonable community for advice. For anyone interested, we’re happy to send details.

About the author

Cheryl Heller

Cheryl Heller

Cheryl Heller is the Founding Chair of the first MFA program in Design for Social Innovation at SVA, founder of design lab CommonWise, and a pioneer in social impact design. Cheryl received the AIGA medal for her contribution to the field of design in 2014. She is the former Board Chair and founding faculty for the PopTech Social Innovation Fellows, a Senior Fellow at Babson Social Innovation Lab, and the Innovation Advisory Board for the Lumina Foundation. She created the Ideas that Matter program for Sappi, which has given over $12 million to designers working for the public good.

Leave a Comment


  • I absolutely love this post. Combat poverty as if you were going to start a billion dollar business. Why? Because you are actually going to have to according to Cheryl Heller and Paul Polak.

  • I find that most people I talk to agree with this… but I'm interested. Who disagrees and why? Where does business-thinking fall short of combating poverty?

  • Wow… I love some of the thought provoking blogs I am sign-up for…. I hope to attend UNREASONABLE INSTITUTE someday… but until then, I will read their blogs. Excellent article on "Forget Poverty… Let's Talk Business".

  • A lot of my work has been with NGOs and similar. Peace Corps particularly comes to mind. One benefit of this gov't sponsored program is sending multitudes of Americans to developing countries where they develop, first-hand, empathy and heart-felt concern for BFPs. Also, it was info & skills I was pedling, stuff with potential to save farmers' (& families' and communities') land from being washed away by erosion. Like US extension programs, I think there is a place for subsidized help. A third benefit of PC is that all those volunteers come back home as ambassadors to our people here. All this is by no means an argument against Polak's work–we need more of his ilk. But we can use a mix, and I am interested in how different approaches can complement each other.

  • There's another aspect to this….we so often treat poverty as a policy or political failure….but often times it is a market failure for which there is a market solution and an appropriate (possibly new) business model to address it. So constantly relying on governments and ngos and/or traditional development experts is nice, but query as to whether that transforms lives, or local economies (or even the nature of capitalism itself, i.e. capitalism as a spreader of prosperity, rather than a tool of the excessively consumptive and potentially greedy).

  • Thought provoking: "It scales well beyond the village. When people move from $2 a day to $3 or 4, they become consumers; that makes a huge impact on the global economy.
    They start to pay taxes, they have smaller families. Raising the income level of farmers has been proven to raise the economies of entire countries, like China, South Korea and Taiwan."

  • We need more people in this world like Paul! More people who act on where they see a need and not just talk about these problems. Do something about it. If you do not like something change it. It is so crazy that Paul did something against the norm for business men and now he’s the successful one. What made Paul believe this could work for himself, yet anyone who would try this idea?

  • i like you way of thinking Paul. The world needs more people to actually DO something about these problems instead of just all the talk we get surrounded by. This a great idea and hope more follow in your leading footsteps.

  • I completely agree with Kait Harman. If we really want to see a change in this world, we need to “Do something about it.” Big ideas on how to improve the world are great to talk about, but nothing will ever get accomplished if no one takes the first step in putting those ideas into action. Paul Polak is such an inspirational man! If only other entrepreneurs and leaders would follow his lead and do something!

  • I really like that idea too, one interesting idea is to start a business in an impoverished area, allowing for jobs to be created for those in poverty, while creating business for your company (fairly–no sweatshops!!)

  • Third Flower

    My spouse and i are already now delighted that Albert could execute his studies due to the ideas he had via your web page. It’s every now and then perplexing to only constantly be giving freely actions which some people could have been selling. So we…

  • I like it. I’ve always felt that I live amongst a population that talks A LOT, but does so little. What is even more crazy, is that there are so many of us that have the same feelings and ideas, yet nobody acts on it. We’re a species that tends to wait, wait, and wait some more until that one person steps up, makes the first move and everybody follows. Too many followers, not enough leaders.

  • The Silent Shard

    This will likely likely be very handy for many within your job opportunities I intend to you should not only with my blog but

  • The Birch of the Shadow

    I think there might be a couple of duplicates, but an exceedingly useful list! I’ve tweeted this. Lots of thanks for sharing!

  • The Birch of the Shadow

    I believe there may be considered a couple of duplicates, but an exceedingly handy listing! I have tweeted this. Numerous thanks for sharing!

  • Third Flower

    My wife and that i are now delighted that Albert could perform his studies thanks to the strategies he had through your online page. It really is every now and then perplexing to only normally be giving freely ways which a number of people could have b…

  • Woman of Alien

    Perfect perform you have completed, this site is basically neat with wonderful information. Time is God’s technique for trying to keep almost everything from occurring directly.

  • The Birch of the Shadow

    I think there might become a few duplicates, but an exceedingly useful checklist! I have tweeted this. Many thanks for sharing!

  • The Birch of the Shadow

    I think there might be a number of duplicates, but an exceedingly helpful checklist! I have tweeted this. Quite a few thanks for sharing!

  • The Absent Game

    Concerning me and my husband we have owned far more MP3 players through the years than I can count, which includes Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players.

  • Third Flower

    My spouse and that i are actually now delighted that Albert could execute his scientific tests on account of the tips he had through your online page. It’s from time to time perplexing to simply usually be giving away methods which a number of people…

  • The Absent Game

    Among me and my husband we have owned far more MP3 players over time than I can count, like Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of gamers.

  • The Absent Game

    Concerning me and my husband we have owned far more MP3 players over time than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (traditional & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players.

  • Third Flower

    My spouse and i are now delighted that Albert could perform his reports due to the ideas he had by means of your online page. It is now and again perplexing to just usually be freely giving measures which many people could have been providing. So we co…

  • The Birch of the Shadow

    I think there might be considered a handful of duplicates, but an exceedingly helpful record! I’ve tweeted this. Quite a few thanks for sharing!

  • The Silent Shard

    This may likely be pretty handy for many of your positions I intend to do not only with my web site but

  • When I read an article like this it reminds me of the people that I have encountered when I travel. Many times I see people actively looking for ways to transform their lives by starting a small enterprise. They turn home cook meals into a savory dish, they bring perfume to your doorstep and breakdown the payments, they innovate new ways to cool down food during transportation or the bank that realized that given micro loans could generate business and get a continuous return on payment. So, the ability to see that people are creating these businesses and sustaining them should also point to the market potential that already exist. However, as social innovators our projects should include a path of self sustainability for the communities we decide to work with. It can be inclusive, democratic and empowering while at the same time innovative and profit generating.